2019
DOI: 10.1002/ecs2.2692
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linking tree physiological constraints with predictions of carbon and water fluxes at an old‐growth coniferous forest

Abstract: Old‐growth coniferous forests of the Pacific Northwest are among the most productive temperate ecosystems and have the capacity to store large amounts of carbon for multiple centuries. To date, there are considerable gaps in modeling ecosystem fluxes and their responses to physiological constraints in these old‐growth forests. These model shortcomings limit our ability to understand and project how the old‐growth forests of the Pacific Northwest will respond to global climate change. This study applies the coh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Leaf energy budget theory is embedded in most LSMs. However, LSMs underestimate observed temporal and spatial variability in T can (Dong et al ., 2017; Jiang et al ., 2019), which implies that they are not capturing aspects of canopy structure and function. We suggest that T can observations can be used to help benchmark LSMs (Collier et al ., 2018) and test the accuracy of modeled T can and its implications for temperature‐dependent water and C cycling predictions.…”
Section: Future Opportunitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leaf energy budget theory is embedded in most LSMs. However, LSMs underestimate observed temporal and spatial variability in T can (Dong et al ., 2017; Jiang et al ., 2019), which implies that they are not capturing aspects of canopy structure and function. We suggest that T can observations can be used to help benchmark LSMs (Collier et al ., 2018) and test the accuracy of modeled T can and its implications for temperature‐dependent water and C cycling predictions.…”
Section: Future Opportunitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Forest drought responses vary across temporal scales (Cavender‐Bares & Bazzaz, 2000). Short‐time responses (i.e., minutes to hours) include changes in stomatal closure (Jiang et al, 2019), altered energy balance (Sippel et al, 2018), a regulation of photosynthesis (Clark et al, 2016), and lowered hydraulic conductivity (Adams et al, 2017; Kukowski et al, 2013). Seasonal responses include phenological alterations, such as early wilting (Brun et al, 2020), leaf discoloration, leaf loss (MeteoSchweiz, 2018), growth reductions (Cailleret et al, 2017), and changes in resource allocation and repair mechanisms (Sippel et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, more detail in stand structure increases the dependence on initialization and parameter accuracy and decreases generality of the model results. Therefore, the use of 2-3 cohorts in the few process-oriented ecosystem models that are available is still a common choice (Deckmyn et al 2008;Jiang et al 2019).…”
Section: Limitations and Potential Model Improvementsmentioning
confidence: 99%