2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2019.102135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linking climate change and socioeconomic development to urban land use simulation: Analysis of their concurrent effects on carbon storage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
40
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
3
40
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Carbon storages in Bishkek and Dushanbe are predicted to decrease by 0.65 Tg and 0.52 Tg under the BDS, 0.16 Tg, and 0.16 Tg under the CPS, 0.5 Tg, and 0.17 Tg under the EPS, respectively. These results are in agreement with previously reported findings that future carbon storage is prone to decline [18][19][20][21]. On the contrary, Carbon storage in Nur Sultan manifests a growing tendency under all scenarios, with a growth of 0.01 Tg, 0.11 Tg, and 0.14 Tg under the BDS, CPS, and EPS, respectively.…”
Section: Carbon Storage Changes Under Three Scenariossupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Carbon storages in Bishkek and Dushanbe are predicted to decrease by 0.65 Tg and 0.52 Tg under the BDS, 0.16 Tg, and 0.16 Tg under the CPS, 0.5 Tg, and 0.17 Tg under the EPS, respectively. These results are in agreement with previously reported findings that future carbon storage is prone to decline [18][19][20][21]. On the contrary, Carbon storage in Nur Sultan manifests a growing tendency under all scenarios, with a growth of 0.01 Tg, 0.11 Tg, and 0.14 Tg under the BDS, CPS, and EPS, respectively.…”
Section: Carbon Storage Changes Under Three Scenariossupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Furthermore, the ratios of carbon storage loss induced by urban expansion to the total carbon storage growth in Bishkek, Dushanbe, and Tashkent will be more than 1.1 under all scenarios. These results indicate an evident negative impact of future urban expansion on carbon storage, which is also reported by Jiang et al [18], Yang et al [19], He et al [20], and Zhang et al [22]. Meanwhile, carbon storage in Nur Sultan will show relatively less loss under the influence of urban expansion.…”
Section: Impacts Of Future Urban Expansion On Carbon Storagesupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other side, carbon storage and sequestration as one of the most common regulating services were quantified and mapped by researchers (Nackoney 2003;Stringer et al 2012;Kanime et al 2013;Jiang et al 2017;Wang and Qie 2018;White, R.P. ;Yang et al 2020). Although various studies of linkage the LUCC with carbon storage and sequestration have been internationally carried out, the target area of studies is mainly focused on cities and coastal ecoregions (Zhao et al 2016), mountainous regions (Zhao et al 2018), and flood plains (Lininger et al 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The third is to apply it to actual decision-making according to the results of land use simulation. Generally, multi-scenario simulations are carried out by changing the restrictions [ 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 ] to analyze the possible value of a specific target in different scenarios to support the spatial decision-making process. In addition, some scholars began to pay attention to the changes in specific land types in the city, such as built-up land density [ 25 ] and residential land growth [ 26 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%