Linguistic Pragmatics of Intercultural Professional and Business Communication

Abstract

the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Emotive Lexis In English-Language Corporate Communication: The Linguo-Pragmatic Aspect

“…One of the key concerns here are the possible ways to ensure the efficiency of corporate communication. While emotive lexis registered in corporate communication has found wide enough coverage in the scientific literature (Agostino, Im-Bolter, Stefanatos, & Dennis, 2017;Andreeva, Makarova, Gorbunova, & Lukina, 2019;Balmer, & Burghausen, 2017;Fuoli & Hart, 2018;Malyuga & Orlova, 2018), the question of its linguistic-pragmatic properties in both spoken and written registers remains understudied.…”

Interaction of Professional Jargon and Linguistic Identity

“…The language means applied in specific professional spheres can be presented as a system, where all notions are interconnected through logical relations of subordination and coordination. Many linguists [2,3,4,5] view professional language as a terminology system with its core represented by terminology. Such system also incorporates professional jargon, as it denotes notions associated with the rapidly emerging domains of activity and not yet correlated with any officially recognised designations.…”

Transregionalism in relations between Latin America and the European Union

“…Given the current circumstances, the EU-LAC relations, recently considered to be of marginal interest, are imminently becoming the core of the international agenda (MALYUGA, ORLOVA, 2017). Analyzing the experience of interaction between Latin America and the European Union promotes a better understanding of fundamental trends in global and transregional development, as well as discerning new approaches towards solving the problems of finding alternative partners and fostering cross-regional relations, which are relevant for the Russian Federation (KOZLOVSKAYA, RASTYAGAEV, SLOZHENIKINA, 2020).…”