1999
DOI: 10.1515/ling.1999.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linguistic categories and linguists categorizations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…above and Sapir 1921:119), while other parts of speech appear only in some languages, but not in others. Even this fundamental division has been questioned, however, in that some languages have been described as having only verbs (e.g., Cayuga, see Ramat 1999), while other languages represent the opposite extreme, using no more than a handful of simple verbs (e.g., Kalam, see Pawley 1993). 5…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…above and Sapir 1921:119), while other parts of speech appear only in some languages, but not in others. Even this fundamental division has been questioned, however, in that some languages have been described as having only verbs (e.g., Cayuga, see Ramat 1999), while other languages represent the opposite extreme, using no more than a handful of simple verbs (e.g., Kalam, see Pawley 1993). 5…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2. Nimisõna ja verbi süntaktilised funktsioonid on vastavalt argument ja predikaat (Alfieri 2007;Anderson 2004;Anward 2001;Bhat 2000;Broschart 1997;Croft 2005;Helmbrecht 2001;Jacobsen 1979;Peterson 2007;Ramat 1999;Sasse 1993b) 27 . Üldlevinud arvamuse kohaselt on predikaat ja argument tavakeeles universaalsed.…”
Section: Nimisõnad Verbid Ja Fleksiiblid (Ja Nende Tüpoloogilisedunclassified
“…* argument/predicator (Anderson 2004). * nomination/predication (Ramat 1999). * referent/predication (Alfieri 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both items fall within the same class (noun) and are defined through the same features (case, gender, number), but they show different values for each feature (no specified value for rēg-; nom.m.sg. for rēx), see Ramat (1999).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%