2016
DOI: 10.1117/12.2218863
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Line width roughness accuracy analysis during pattern transfer in self-aligned quadruple patterning process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…of CD scanning electron microscopy, such as averaging, field of view, and pixel size, for the determination of LER and LWR. 7 We have also demonstrated the interpretation and feed-forward of data from scatterometry to improve the control of pitch walk. 8 The performance of SAQP that we have achieved is quite close to the specifications of the technology.…”
Section: 1117/21201604006378 Page 3/3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…of CD scanning electron microscopy, such as averaging, field of view, and pixel size, for the determination of LER and LWR. 7 We have also demonstrated the interpretation and feed-forward of data from scatterometry to improve the control of pitch walk. 8 The performance of SAQP that we have achieved is quite close to the specifications of the technology.…”
Section: 1117/21201604006378 Page 3/3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, novel EUV resist platforms will undoubtedly employ radically different approaches to patterning, which will likely result in different characteristic LWR metrics. It is worth mentioning that the roughness transfer from the photoresist during plasma etching affects the spatial components of LWR in different ways, 4,5 which is of course of technological interest for process integration. For these reasons, this work provides a comparative study of the LWR performance of various photoresists according to the abovementioned metrics and an interpretation is proposed.…”
Section: -02mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LER measurements done only by CD-SEM are no longer reliable when considering recent lithography advances; the determination of a new LER metrology method thus poses a new metrology challenge for 3-D device structures. 5 Two LER reference metrology techniques that offer a high-resolution sidewall profile and provide a reference standard 6 to evaluate CD-SEM have been proposed, including the use of transmission electron microscopy (TEM) [7][8][9][10] and atomic force microscopy (AFM). [11][12][13] The TEM technique involves preparing the sample using a focused ion beam instrument so that the *Address all correspondence to Ryosuke Kizu, E-mail: r-kizu@aist.go.jp horizontally sliced image of the line patterns, i.e., projected onto the xy plane, can be measured by TEM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[11][12][13] The TEM technique involves preparing the sample using a focused ion beam instrument so that the *Address all correspondence to Ryosuke Kizu, E-mail: r-kizu@aist.go.jp horizontally sliced image of the line patterns, i.e., projected onto the xy plane, can be measured by TEM. [7][8][9][10] This technique allows for higher resolution due to less noise when compared with the conventional SEM technique, the simultaneous measurement of multiple line patterns in a field-of-view, and the analysis of actual devices. However, it is a destructive metrology technique.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%