2020
DOI: 10.1109/access.2020.3045327
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limits of Effective Material Properties in the Context of an Electromagnetic Tissue Model

Abstract: Most calibration schemes for reflection-based tissue spectroscopy in the mm-wave/THzfrequency range are based on homogenized, frequency-dependent tissue models where macroscopic material parameters have either been determined by measurement or calculated using effective material theory. However, as the resolution of measurement at these frequencies captures the underlying microstructure of the tissue, we will investigate the validity limits of such effective material models over a wide frequency range (10 MHz … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 28 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to this setup, the (computational) unit cell is effectively periodically extended in each direction indicated by the PBC. This approach was used in the past to investigate the effective material parameters of randomized (bio‐)composites [Krakovsky and Myroshnychenko, 2002; Jerbic et al, 2020], and single cells [Huclova et al, 2010; Froehlich et al, 2014]. A description of how these simulations are verified by mixing rules is given in the Appendix.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to this setup, the (computational) unit cell is effectively periodically extended in each direction indicated by the PBC. This approach was used in the past to investigate the effective material parameters of randomized (bio‐)composites [Krakovsky and Myroshnychenko, 2002; Jerbic et al, 2020], and single cells [Huclova et al, 2010; Froehlich et al, 2014]. A description of how these simulations are verified by mixing rules is given in the Appendix.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%