1995
DOI: 10.1016/0030-4018(95)00027-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Light propagation in the Fresnel region. New numerical approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
69
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
69
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The propagation was calculated by means of the modi− fied convolution method [15,16]. The obtained light inten− sity in the z 1 plane is presented in Fig.…”
Section: Numerical Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The propagation was calculated by means of the modi− fied convolution method [15,16]. The obtained light inten− sity in the z 1 plane is presented in Fig.…”
Section: Numerical Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use Fresnel approximation [16], [17] to get the near-field distribution , which is given by where is the complex amplitude of the excitation at point on the 45 microcoupler. is the complex amplitude of the observed field at point , and the magnitude of wave vector and the distance from the upper surface of the 45 microcoupler to observation point.…”
Section: Thin-film Waveguide Couplersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the laser junction is composed of elementary fully coherent sources which are not mutually correlated. We perform the modelling of the active area of the laser diode in such a way that nonparaxial propagation [11][12][13][14] leads us to measured far field distribution. Finally, we use such an approach to design the diffractive structure shaping the beam coming from the LD in the expected way.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The numerical calculations were based on the modified convolution method for a non-paraxial approach [11][12][13][14]. All calculations were carried out for the wavelength λ=0.904µm on th matri 16384×16384 points with the sampling 0.25μm×0.25μm.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%