1966
DOI: 10.1016/0002-9416(66)90002-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Light force technique combining the sliding section and laminated arches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1968
1968
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 2 , 10 , 13 , 15 The extractions with orthodontic purpose, for correction of tooth crowding or intermaxillary discrepancies, have been controversial since the concepts of normal occlusion were initially enhanced, in the early 20 th century. 3 , 11 , 16 , 17 , 27 - 29 Any tooth may be extracted, depending on each case, to provide more satisfactory esthetic and functional outcomes. Within this sense, there is consensus that the planning of orthodontic treatment should be customized.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… 2 , 10 , 13 , 15 The extractions with orthodontic purpose, for correction of tooth crowding or intermaxillary discrepancies, have been controversial since the concepts of normal occlusion were initially enhanced, in the early 20 th century. 3 , 11 , 16 , 17 , 27 - 29 Any tooth may be extracted, depending on each case, to provide more satisfactory esthetic and functional outcomes. Within this sense, there is consensus that the planning of orthodontic treatment should be customized.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 16 , 17 , 33 James 6 and Dewel 3 , 28 described the moderate space deficiency, which is characteristic of borderline cases in individuals with balanced facial contours, as one of the basic diagnostic requirements for indication of extractions of second premolars. According to Carey, 29 better results were achieved when malocclusions with discrepancies between 2.5 and 5 mm were treated by extraction of second premolars. However, according to Schoppe, 34 the main indication included cases with discrepancies up to 7.5 mm, in individuals with muscular balance, proportional facial contour and incisors well-positioned in the dental arches.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%