2003
DOI: 10.1093/treephys/23.10.685
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Light-energy processing and freezing-tolerance traits in red spruce and black spruce: species and seed-source variation

Abstract: Red spruce (Picea rubens Sarg.) and black spruce (Picea mariana (Mill.) B.S.P.) are genetically and morphologically similar but ecologically distinct species. We determined intraspecific seed-source and interspecific variation of red spruce and black spruce, from across the near-northern margins of their ranges, for several light-energy processing and freezing-tolerance adaptive traits. Before exposure to low temperature, red spruce had variable fluorescence (Fv) similar to black spruce, but higher photochemic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
22
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
5
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They found no unique alleles in red spruce and suggested red spruce may have evolved from black spruce via allopatric speciation because of glaciation-induced isolation. Their conclusions may be logical given the limited number of loci they studied; however, red spruce has genetic traits that clearly distinguish it from black spruce, including partial sexual incompatibility (this study), seedling growth rate (this study), growth rate in the field (Johnsen et al 1998), cone, leaf, and stem morphology (Manley 1971;Johnsen et al 1998), and adaptive traits (Major et al 2003a(Major et al , 2003c. Again, we emphasize caution must be applied to interpretations based solely on molecular markers as, so far, they provide a limited (albeit still important) view of the spruce genome and that available molecular data do not reflect adaptive differences.…”
Section: Hybridizationmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…They found no unique alleles in red spruce and suggested red spruce may have evolved from black spruce via allopatric speciation because of glaciation-induced isolation. Their conclusions may be logical given the limited number of loci they studied; however, red spruce has genetic traits that clearly distinguish it from black spruce, including partial sexual incompatibility (this study), seedling growth rate (this study), growth rate in the field (Johnsen et al 1998), cone, leaf, and stem morphology (Manley 1971;Johnsen et al 1998), and adaptive traits (Major et al 2003a(Major et al , 2003c. Again, we emphasize caution must be applied to interpretations based solely on molecular markers as, so far, they provide a limited (albeit still important) view of the spruce genome and that available molecular data do not reflect adaptive differences.…”
Section: Hybridizationmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Ecological barriers would appear to be quite strong, given the very different ecological and adaptive traits (Major et al 2003a(Major et al , 2003c and successional roles of red and black spruce (i.e., early-vs. late-successional forest types) (Blum 1990;Viereck and Johnston 1990;Seymour 1992). However, in areas of sympatry (most of the red spruce range), particularly those dominated by human disturbances such as clearcutting, increased opportunities for natural hybridization might be expected.…”
Section: Genecological Barriersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The westernmost extension of RS occurs as disjunct remnants in a highly fragmented metapopulation associated with the Algonquin Highlands of southern Ontario . Red spruce and BS occupy ecologically distinct niches with a suite of species-specific morphological allocation and light-energy processing traits (Major et al 2003a(Major et al , b, 2007a. Estimates of the extent of natural hybridization and introgression range from extensive (Morgenstern and Farrar 1964;Manley 1972;Bobola et al 1996) to minor (Gordon 1976;Manley and Ledig 1979;Mosseler et al 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%