2017
DOI: 10.1002/ece3.2682
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asymmetry matters: A genomic assessment of directional biases in gene flow between hybridizing spruces

Abstract: Assessing directional bias in interspecific gene flow might be important in determining the evolutionary trajectory of closely related species pairs. Using a set of 300 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) having variable propensity to cross species boundary, we evaluated the genomic extent and direction of interspecific gene flow in a progenitor‐derivative spruce species pair (black spruce and red spruce). A higher rate of gene flow was found from black spruce toward red spruce purebreds than vice versa. Th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In summary, our study highlights an example of interspecific gene flow between ecologically divergent tree species, well‐fitting with the suggestion by Ellstrand (2014) that plant species form meta‐populations that exchange genes with variable, asymmetric rates. Given the relatively small number of neutral genetic markers used, we cannot make inferences about several important points, such as whether the amount of gene flow differs among genomic regions, or whether it involves regions of relevant adaptive value, which would be of great interest in the dissection of the relative weight of selection and gene flow on divergence patterns across the genome (in the Picea mariana / Picea rubens pair, for example, not introgressed or “impermeable” genomic regions coexist with highly introgressed, or “permeable”, ones (de Lafontaine & Bousquet, 2017)). Introgression is emerging as an important source of adaptation as proven by the large number of studies recently published (Suarez‐Gonzalez, Lexer, & Cronk Quentin, 2018, for a review).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In summary, our study highlights an example of interspecific gene flow between ecologically divergent tree species, well‐fitting with the suggestion by Ellstrand (2014) that plant species form meta‐populations that exchange genes with variable, asymmetric rates. Given the relatively small number of neutral genetic markers used, we cannot make inferences about several important points, such as whether the amount of gene flow differs among genomic regions, or whether it involves regions of relevant adaptive value, which would be of great interest in the dissection of the relative weight of selection and gene flow on divergence patterns across the genome (in the Picea mariana / Picea rubens pair, for example, not introgressed or “impermeable” genomic regions coexist with highly introgressed, or “permeable”, ones (de Lafontaine & Bousquet, 2017)). Introgression is emerging as an important source of adaptation as proven by the large number of studies recently published (Suarez‐Gonzalez, Lexer, & Cronk Quentin, 2018, for a review).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All summary statistics were computed using Arlequin 3.5 (Excoffier & Lischer, 2010) and its companion ARLSUMSTAT. Calculations of posterior distributions of parameters were performed using the "abc" R package (Csilléry, François, & Blum, 2012) parameters are scaled to mutation rate (locus −1 generation −1 ), which is also estimated in the model. Absolute value should not be taken as strictly informative; ratios, differences, and comparisons are, on the contrary, entirely meaningful.…”
Section: Coalescent Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where reproductive barriers have evolved, the genomic signature of those barriers may result in regions of differentiation throughout the genome [79,80]. Identification of those regions, or candidate genes associated with those regions, are necessary for genetic conservation and inclusion into breeding programs, particularly if asymmetries have evolved [63,81]. Where genetic signatures of introgression are observed they may result from neutral introgression following contact or selection for different genetic regions in distinct genetic backgrounds [82].…”
Section: Major Barriers To Hybridizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10–13]), association mapping and ecological genomic studies (e.g. [6, 1425]), the management of genetic diversity, and for traceability applications [15, 2629]. One central feature of spruce gene SNPs is that they are informed markers, given the availability of high-confidence annotated spruce gene catalogs (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%