1999
DOI: 10.2172/750888
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Light-Duty Alternative Fuel Vehicles: Federal Test Procedure Emissions Results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kelly et al (1999) using average T/NMHC estimates for CNG vehicles, modified to T/VOC using 1.169 TOG/NMHC (from EPA 1999a) and 0.808 VOC/TOG conversion factors.…”
Section: California Phase 3 Reformulated Gasoline (Carfg3a and Carfg3mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Kelly et al (1999) using average T/NMHC estimates for CNG vehicles, modified to T/VOC using 1.169 TOG/NMHC (from EPA 1999a) and 0.808 VOC/TOG conversion factors.…”
Section: California Phase 3 Reformulated Gasoline (Carfg3a and Carfg3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most recent published analyses of speciated emissions data from light-duty CNG vehicles is in Winebrake and Deaton (1999a) and Kelly et al (1999). In those studies, the researchers analyze data collected at NAFDC on CNG vehicles operating in the federal government fleet.…”
Section: Bi-fuel and Dedicated Compressed Natural Gas Vehiclesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations