2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2020.115519
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Life cycle assessment of nutrient recycling from wastewater: A critical review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
64
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
2
64
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Even further, the environmental benefit of the removal of these nutrients from urban waterbodies should be taken into account as well. As described before, the generation of struvite has requirements but removes potential water and air emissions from WWTP (Ishii and Boyer, 2015a;Igos et al, 2017;Lam, Zlatanović and van der Hoek, 2020). While this last benefit has not been taken into account for this study, the further use of struvite as fertilizer and the consequent fertilization offset accounting have, and can be well observed in these results with the emission reductions in almost all IC.…”
Section: Nutrient Fluxessupporting
confidence: 52%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Even further, the environmental benefit of the removal of these nutrients from urban waterbodies should be taken into account as well. As described before, the generation of struvite has requirements but removes potential water and air emissions from WWTP (Ishii and Boyer, 2015a;Igos et al, 2017;Lam, Zlatanović and van der Hoek, 2020). While this last benefit has not been taken into account for this study, the further use of struvite as fertilizer and the consequent fertilization offset accounting have, and can be well observed in these results with the emission reductions in almost all IC.…”
Section: Nutrient Fluxessupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Recent work has been focused on the recovery of nutrients from wastewater treatment plants (Harder et al, 2019;Lam, Zlatanović and van der Hoek, 2020;Shaddel et al, 2020), showing a great range of possible alternatives for fertilization generated in urban areas as well as their constraints. One of the available options showing great potential for its use in agriculture, is struvite.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To make it easier for farmers to get the excreta, some cesspools were built on the open next to the shelter. As described in available researches ( Heinonen-Tanski and van Wijk-Sijbesma, 2005 ; Lam et al, 2020a ; Mamera et al, 2020 ), human urine and feces as fertilizer could meet the needs of plants for potassium and phosphorus, and improve soil structure, and using human excreta as fertilizer is free, which leads to the villagers like to use excreta as fertilizer. Through surveying 27 villages in Jiangxi and Hubei provinces by contacting the village committees through phone, email and WeChat, it was found that about 0%–60% (31% on average) of rural households used the excreta directly from the pit latrines as crop fertilizer in recent 3 years.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LCA allows us to compare different systems, products, and processes regarding the production and self-usage of energy and the extraction of the raw materials included in various treatment unit combinations [4] to find the best process scenario available [5]. Since the 1990s, different WWT topics have been examined in several previous LCA studies [6]: plant modifications and operations [7][8][9][10][11][12], modeling [13][14][15][16][17][18][19], sludge processes [11,[20][21][22], greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions [4,23,24], rainfall impact [6,25], and uncertainty [5,[26][27][28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%