2021
DOI: 10.3390/en14020356
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Life Cycle Assessment of Municipal Wastewater Treatment Processes Regarding Energy Production from the Sludge Line

Abstract: The efficient and timely removal of organic matter and nutrients from water used in normal municipal functions is considered to be the main task of wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). Therefore, these facilities are considered to be essential units that are required to avoid pollution of the water environment and decrease the possibility of triggering eutrophication. Even though these benefits are undeniable, they remain at odds with the high energy demand of wastewater treatment and sludge processes. As a co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is likely that additional GHG emissions are attributable to the water and wastewater treatment sector from onsite natural gas combustion, however no data could be found to quantify this emissions source. Offsite manufacturing of chemicals used for water and wastewater treatment have also been hypothesized to contribute significantly to the sector's life cycle GHG footprint, but estimates of this quantity in the literature vary widely (Kyung et al, 2015;Szulc et al, 2021). Combustion of fossil fuel across the entire energy sector in the US emits 5300 MMT of CO 2 .…”
Section: Differences In Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is likely that additional GHG emissions are attributable to the water and wastewater treatment sector from onsite natural gas combustion, however no data could be found to quantify this emissions source. Offsite manufacturing of chemicals used for water and wastewater treatment have also been hypothesized to contribute significantly to the sector's life cycle GHG footprint, but estimates of this quantity in the literature vary widely (Kyung et al, 2015;Szulc et al, 2021). Combustion of fossil fuel across the entire energy sector in the US emits 5300 MMT of CO 2 .…”
Section: Differences In Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the field of wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs), the PEF/OEF can be leveraged to identify the best alternatives to adopt in an upgrade scenario or to establish the best operation decision from an environmental footprint standpoint. Furthermore, this methodology can be applied to estimate the overall environmental impact in terms of both direct impacts and indirect impacts [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. The direct impacts are linked to effluents and other emissions, whereas the indirect impacts are linked to energy and resources consumed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Life Cycle Assessment analysis is used in many similar projects, which were considered by [12,13]. The authors of the study [13] developed an environmental analysis of the operating treatment plant using ReCiPe, which allowed them to identify points that can be improved in the technology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Life Cycle Assessment analysis is used in many similar projects, which were considered by [12,13]. The authors of the study [13] developed an environmental analysis of the operating treatment plant using ReCiPe, which allowed them to identify points that can be improved in the technology. Skoczko et al [14] compared two wastewater treatment technologies in analogous industrial plants, thanks to which a more advantageous solution was specified.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation