2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11814-021-0761-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Life cycle assessment of LPG and diesel vehicles in Korea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
0
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of LPG in SI and CI transport vehicles also emitted less particulate matter, NOx, CO2, and toxic gases when compared with FB fuels. Similar tests conducted in Ghana [50], Korea [51], India [52], and other jurisdictions indicated that LPG is a sustainable and environmentally friendly alternative fuel for transport vehicles.…”
Section: Propanementioning
confidence: 67%
“…The use of LPG in SI and CI transport vehicles also emitted less particulate matter, NOx, CO2, and toxic gases when compared with FB fuels. Similar tests conducted in Ghana [50], Korea [51], India [52], and other jurisdictions indicated that LPG is a sustainable and environmentally friendly alternative fuel for transport vehicles.…”
Section: Propanementioning
confidence: 67%
“…In South Korea, the possibility of using LPG can alleviate the negative impacts of using traditional carbon-based fuels on several accounts. Studies have shown that LPG decreased the annual consumption rate by 7.5-10.4% and the fuel price by 8.8-25.9% and the SOx, NOx and PM emissions were also cut down by 10-14% [69][70][71].…”
Section: Environmental Impactmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fuel costs also have limitations, such as not considering tax exemptions for each fuel. Kim et al, conducted a study using an LCA approach for LPG and diesel vehicles in South Korea and found that LPG vehicles are more favorable than diesel vehicles in terms of GHG emissions [42]. However, it may not be applicable in regions with different energy sources and production methods, and it assumes that fuel efficiency remains constant regardless of fuel type.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%