2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeconbus.2007.04.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leverage and business groups: Evidence from Indian firms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
86
1
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
4
86
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They also report that the debt financing is determined by the standard determinants of capital structure theories, but Chaebol firms have relatively higher leverage as compared to non-Chaebol firms. Similar results are documented by the Manos et al (2007) for India. Their results favor the direct implication of pecking order theory within the business group due to its features such as lower information asymmetry in affiliated firms, increased access to external capital, and creation of internal market.…”
Section: Literature Reviewsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They also report that the debt financing is determined by the standard determinants of capital structure theories, but Chaebol firms have relatively higher leverage as compared to non-Chaebol firms. Similar results are documented by the Manos et al (2007) for India. Their results favor the direct implication of pecking order theory within the business group due to its features such as lower information asymmetry in affiliated firms, increased access to external capital, and creation of internal market.…”
Section: Literature Reviewsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Manos et al (2007) discuss the implications of three capital structure theories and their affiliation with business groups 4 . They point out that lower information asymmetries among group affiliates, better access to the external markets and policy makers (Ghemawat & Khanna, 1998), easy access to foreign capital and technology (Khanna & Palepu, 2000), reputation sharing (Chang & Hong, 2000) and the internal capital market are the key factors directly linked to the pecking order theory.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kim et al (2006), studying Korean firms' capital structure before the 1997 crisis, find that chaebol affiliates are more indebted than stand-alone firms and explain this finding with the cross-debt guarantees supplied by the other chaebol members, which allow banks to reduce loan riskiness. Manos et al (2007) present evidence on 1,652 quoted non-financial firms in India and…”
Section: B Firms' Capital Structurementioning
confidence: 89%
“…Other firms in ownership structure appear as important players in this context signaling that such blockholders seem to be well and timely informed about firm investment opportunities and funding sources. In fact, there is evidence that the membership to corporate groups in Japan and India improves access to external credit market (Hoshi, Kashyap, & Scharfstein, 1991;Lensink & Van der Molen, 2010;Manos, Murinde, & Green, 2007). Also in the context of investment policy, the presence of a nonfinancial firm as a relevant blockholder favors investment policy and reduces the intensity of financial constraints in USA (Allen & Phillips, 2000).…”
Section: Dividend Policy and Agency Conflictsmentioning
confidence: 99%