Contractual Networks, Inter-Firm Cooperation and Economic Growth 2011
DOI: 10.4337/9781849809696.00009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do Inter-firm Networks Make Access to Finance Easier? Issues and Empirical Evidence

Abstract: Does participation in inter-firm networks make access to credit easier for firms? Is finance a motivation driving the formation of inter-firm networks? During the last twenty years these two questions have been hotly debated by economists both theoretically and empirically. In this paper, we selectively review the literature on inter-firm networking, internal capital markets and access to external credit.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Inter-firm credit has been found to be particularly relevant in productive clusters, e.g. Italian industrial districts: evidence shows that geographic proximity, reciprocity, and repeated transactions between suppliers and customers increase reputation and trust and reduce asymmetric information problems, thus favouring inter-firm credit relationships (DEI OTTATI, 1994;UGHETTO, 2009;SCALERA and ZAZZARO, 2011).…”
Section: Localization Economies and Productivitymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Inter-firm credit has been found to be particularly relevant in productive clusters, e.g. Italian industrial districts: evidence shows that geographic proximity, reciprocity, and repeated transactions between suppliers and customers increase reputation and trust and reduce asymmetric information problems, thus favouring inter-firm credit relationships (DEI OTTATI, 1994;UGHETTO, 2009;SCALERA and ZAZZARO, 2011).…”
Section: Localization Economies and Productivitymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…DEFINITIONS: Both terminologies concern the relationships of a business and are used interchangeably in previous literature (Chipika & Wilson, 2006;Leroy, 2012;Premaratne, 2002;Sawyerr et al, 2003;Scalera & Zazzaro, 2009, Zain & Ng, 2006. Network refers to a set of elements or members that are connected (Casson & Giusta, 2007).…”
Section: Network and Networking: Definitions And Theoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Nieman, 2006) Networks can be defined as patterned, beneficial relationships between individuals, groups or organizations that are used to secure critical economic and non-economic resources needed to start and manage a business. (Scalera & Zazzaro, 2009) Networking can be formal and informal links that are created to allow its members to have cost-effective economic transactions. (Halinen & Törnroos, 1998) Networks are structures of exchange relationships among business actors, firms as well as individuals -structures which emerge, evolve and dissolve over time in a continuous and interactive process.…”
Section: Network and Networking: Definitions And Theoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Local governments can also play an indirect role in supporting firms' productivity improvements by alleviating the negative returns of credit constraints. “Good” formal institutions can promote a “safe” and stable local business environment, where increased reputation and trust among business partners (suppliers and customers) facilitate repeated production transactions and, through these, the emergence of interfirm financial relationships (Cainelli, Montresor, & Vittucci Marzetti, 2012; Dei Ottati, 1994; Scalera & Zazzaro, 2011). Trade credit—that can materialize through better contracts or delayed payments—represents a key alternative source of financing for firms to alleviate credit constraints.…”
Section: Theoretical Framework and Research Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%