2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0093-934x(03)00303-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Levels of processing with free and cued recall and unilateral temporal lobe epilepsy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
8
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This may be explained by several conceptualizations: (1) that memories are enhanced as a result of self-generation of information because there is an increase in distinctiveness in the to-be-remembered items (McDaniel, et al 1988); (2) individuals may be more likely to remember information because they feel self-empowered by participating in the creation of information (Olofsson & Nilsson 1992); (3) increased relevance of information leads to increased motivation and, as a result, enhances learning (Walsh, et al 1995); and (4) the belief that information that is processed at a deeper level of meaning will be better remembered because the strategy enforces a certain type and depth of processing (Craik 2002, Lespinet-Najib, et al 2004). Indeed, the depth-of-processing literature has well-documented the behavioral finding that verbal information is more effectively remembered when it is encoded with greater involvement of its semantics (Craik 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be explained by several conceptualizations: (1) that memories are enhanced as a result of self-generation of information because there is an increase in distinctiveness in the to-be-remembered items (McDaniel, et al 1988); (2) individuals may be more likely to remember information because they feel self-empowered by participating in the creation of information (Olofsson & Nilsson 1992); (3) increased relevance of information leads to increased motivation and, as a result, enhances learning (Walsh, et al 1995); and (4) the belief that information that is processed at a deeper level of meaning will be better remembered because the strategy enforces a certain type and depth of processing (Craik 2002, Lespinet-Najib, et al 2004). Indeed, the depth-of-processing literature has well-documented the behavioral finding that verbal information is more effectively remembered when it is encoded with greater involvement of its semantics (Craik 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In delayed recall, the right temporal lobe epilepsy group scored lower than the healthy comparison group, which is inconsistent with material-specific memory impairment. 19,20,33 No significant difference was found between the right temporal lobe epilepsy and the left temporal lobe epilepsy groups in delayed recall. Although the right temporal lobe epilepsy group showed poorer performance in free recall than the healthy comparison group, they outperformed the schizophrenia group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Enquanto isso, a evocação livre parece ser um preditor de outras demências, como a demência vascular (Grober et al, 2010). A codifi cação semântica, com posterior evocação livre e com pistas, também tem sido utilizada na distinção e avaliação de défi cits de memória em pacientes com epilepsia unilateral à direita ou à esquerda (Lespinet-Najib et al, 2004). Por fi m, a estrutura fatorial observada pode ser associada ao processamento de áreas distintas do cérebro, o que pode ser útil no diagnóstico diferencial de patologias neurológicas.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified