2016
DOI: 10.1038/eye.2016.165
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Levator resection with suspensory ligament of the superior fornix suspension for correction of pediatric congenital ptosis with poor levator function

Abstract: PurposeTo evaluate the surgical outcome of levator resection with suspensory ligament of the superior fornix (SLSF) suspension in severe congenital ptosis with poor levator function (LF).Patients and methodsThe medical records of 25 patients who underwent levator resection with SLSF suspension between March 2011 and January 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. All of the patients had severe congenital ptosis (>4 mm) and poor LF (<4 mm). The follow-up time ranged from 12 to 18 months (median, 15 months). Data re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(11 reference statements)
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This may be due to the long relaxation time of elastic materials used in frontalis suspension leads to unstable results and upper eyelid retraction. In frontalis suspension, excessive movement of the frontalis muscle may induce inflammation, infection, extravasation, extrusion of materials, eyelid deformation, and involuntary paroxysmal movement of eyelids in the upward direction [16]. In comparison, CFS is less invasive and harmful to tissues and blood vessels and does not change the movement direction of the upper eyelid, thereby reducing lid lag.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be due to the long relaxation time of elastic materials used in frontalis suspension leads to unstable results and upper eyelid retraction. In frontalis suspension, excessive movement of the frontalis muscle may induce inflammation, infection, extravasation, extrusion of materials, eyelid deformation, and involuntary paroxysmal movement of eyelids in the upward direction [16]. In comparison, CFS is less invasive and harmful to tissues and blood vessels and does not change the movement direction of the upper eyelid, thereby reducing lid lag.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, good surgical results were achieved after surgery in both group A and group B. The mean MRD1 of group A at the last visit was 3.00 ± 0.69 mm, which approximates the result of 3.10 ± 0.22 (22). The corrective effect was 77.78% at the last visit in group A, which is better than the result of 67.92% in a previous report (23).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Frontalis muscle suspension and shortening of levator palpebrae superioris muscle are both common surgical methods for severe ptosis. Direct frontalis muscle suspension is to ameliorate the symptoms of ptosis by lifting the upper eyelid with the strength of frontalis muscle as a supplementary strengthen or replaced strength and indirect frontalis muscle suspension is to connect the frontalis muscle and tarsus through other materials while shortening of levator palpebrae superioris muscle is an operation method for shortening the levator palpebrae superioris muscle [15][16][17] . Frontalis muscle suspension can lift the upper eyelid with the aid of frontalis muscle to increase the power of lifting eyelid and achieve good surgical results.…”
Section: Table 1: Comparison Of Clinical Efficacy Between the Two Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%