1984
DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/82.2.232
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leukemia with Multiple Phenotypic Expressions

Abstract: A patient is described who, during a three-year illness, exhibited multiple phenotypic expressions of leukemia. She was diagnosed initially as having acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) followed by chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) one and a half years later. Subsequent blast transformations were lymphoblastic, but preterminally, a myeloblastic transformation occurred. These later leukemias probably were not chemotherapy induced, because a review of her initial work-up revealed the presence of a smaller G grou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7 Other, earlier case reports that purportedly described patients presenting with initial Ph(À) ALL diagnoses, followed by CML being detected at a later time, are questionable because of the limitations in ancillary techniques available for a complete workup; 8 lack of cytogenetic information at the time of ALL diagnosis; 9 questionable diagnosis of CML, due to lack of the characteristic t(9;22) translocation; 10,11 and/or the presence of a Ph chromosome at the time of ALL diagnosis, which favors an interpretation of lymphoblastic BP CML (rather than de novo ALL). 12,13 CML can occur as a secondary neoplasm following exposure to radiation and/or chemotherapy. Of 33 published cases of therapy-related CML, 14,15 the majority occurred in adults with a history of classical Hodgkin lymphoma (median age, 43 years; range: 11-70 years).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 Other, earlier case reports that purportedly described patients presenting with initial Ph(À) ALL diagnoses, followed by CML being detected at a later time, are questionable because of the limitations in ancillary techniques available for a complete workup; 8 lack of cytogenetic information at the time of ALL diagnosis; 9 questionable diagnosis of CML, due to lack of the characteristic t(9;22) translocation; 10,11 and/or the presence of a Ph chromosome at the time of ALL diagnosis, which favors an interpretation of lymphoblastic BP CML (rather than de novo ALL). 12,13 CML can occur as a secondary neoplasm following exposure to radiation and/or chemotherapy. Of 33 published cases of therapy-related CML, 14,15 the majority occurred in adults with a history of classical Hodgkin lymphoma (median age, 43 years; range: 11-70 years).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%