1989
DOI: 10.1016/0165-4608(89)90179-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Philadelphia chromosome negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia preceding Philadelphia positive chronic myelogenous leukemia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The only other patient described to have a Ph(−) B-ALL, and subsequently develop CML, is a 12-year-old female initially diagnosed in 2003. 7 Other, earlier case reports that purportedly described patients presenting with initial Ph(−) ALL diagnoses, followed by CML being detected at a later time, are questionable because of the limitations in ancillary techniques available for a complete workup; 8 lack of cytogenetic information at the time of ALL diagnosis; 9 questionable diagnosis of CML, due to lack of the characteristic t(9;22) translocation; 10,11 and/or the presence of a Ph chromosome at the time of ALL diagnosis, which favors an interpretation of lymphoblastic BP CML (rather than de novo ALL). 12,13…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The only other patient described to have a Ph(−) B-ALL, and subsequently develop CML, is a 12-year-old female initially diagnosed in 2003. 7 Other, earlier case reports that purportedly described patients presenting with initial Ph(−) ALL diagnoses, followed by CML being detected at a later time, are questionable because of the limitations in ancillary techniques available for a complete workup; 8 lack of cytogenetic information at the time of ALL diagnosis; 9 questionable diagnosis of CML, due to lack of the characteristic t(9;22) translocation; 10,11 and/or the presence of a Ph chromosome at the time of ALL diagnosis, which favors an interpretation of lymphoblastic BP CML (rather than de novo ALL). 12,13…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%