2001
DOI: 10.1007/s004420100706
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lethal interference competition in the whitefly parasitoids Eretmocerus eremicus and Encarsia sophia

Abstract: Recent population-dynamic theory suggests that mechanisms of lethal interference competition can have profound effects on parasitoid coexistence and pest suppression in biological control systems. We investigated lethal intraspecific and interspecific interference competition in Eretmocerus eremicus and Encarsia sophia, parasitoids of the whitefly pest, Bemisia tabaci. Our first experiments evaluated whether one or both species could suppress the progeny production of the other species through two mechanisms o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As heteronomus autoparasitoids, both E. formosa and E. sophia show high preference for the tobacco whitefly B. tabaci on various host plants, including tomato, eggplant, and poinsettia354041. Previous studies show high competition between these two parasitoids42 or with other Encarsia species that share the same whitefly hosts4344. Although the joint release of multiple whitefly parasitoids could improve the suppression of whiteflies, this has not always been observed (e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As heteronomus autoparasitoids, both E. formosa and E. sophia show high preference for the tobacco whitefly B. tabaci on various host plants, including tomato, eggplant, and poinsettia354041. Previous studies show high competition between these two parasitoids42 or with other Encarsia species that share the same whitefly hosts4344. Although the joint release of multiple whitefly parasitoids could improve the suppression of whiteflies, this has not always been observed (e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The outcome of the competition between different parasitoid species sharing the same host is known to be affected by several factors (McBrein and Mackauer 1990;de Moraes et al 1999;Collier and Hunter 2001;Collier et al 2002;P茅rez-Lachaud et al 2002;de Moraes and Mescher 2005;Yamamoto et al 2007). Of these, development time of the parasitoids from egg to adult stage, oviposition order between parasitoid species, development stage of the host when it is parasitized, and larval morphology of the different competitors are of importance (McBrein and Mackauer 1990;de Moraes et al 1999;de Moraes and Mescher 2005;Yamamoto et al 2007).…”
Section: Physiological Host Rangementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the competitive ability should be considered when selecting a biological control agent (de Moraes et al 1999). The outcome of the competition depends on several factors and different mechanisms have evolved in competitors within multi-parasitized hosts (Fisher 1961;Vinson and Iwantsch 1980;Collier and Hunter 2001;de Moraes and Mescher 2005;Yamamoto et al 2007). Mechanisms involve physical attack and physiological suppression of the less competitive species (Fisher 1961;Vinson and Iwantsch 1980;McBrein and Mackauer 1990;de Moraes et al 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adult parasitoids also have needs beyond the realm of oviposition sites (Shaw 2006a), that may lead to interactions between species. Lethal inter-speciWc interference competition has been observed in parasitoids whereby, hosts parasitized by one species are used for host feeding and killed by another (Collier and Hunter 2001;Collier et al 2002). Indirect relationships between species in the form of apparent competition (Bonsall and Hassell 1998;Holt 1977;Hudson and Greenman 1998) may also have signiWcant consequences for the structure and persistence of parasitoid communities (van Nouhuys and Hanski 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%