Summary 1.Insect parasitoids comprise a large fraction of terrestrial biodiversity. Because of this diversity, species-level conservation of most parasitoid species is impractical and habitat conservation must substitute. However, habitat indicators of parasitoid abundance and diversity are poorly known. 2. To identify such habitat indicators, parasitoid wasps in four ichneumonid subfamilies were sampled in the field herb layer of 15 woodlands in the Vale of York, UK, using Malaise traps. The catch was related to vegetation characteristics. 3. A total of 1543 individuals in 60 species was recorded, representing 36% of UK species in the taxa sampled. Parasitoids tended to be more abundant and species rich in woodlands with a high broadleaf content and tree species richness. This pattern was observed in the ichneumonid subfamilies Pimplinae, Poemeniinae and Diacritinae. 4. However, the ichneumonid subfamily Diplazontinae was found to vary in abundance and richness within rather than between woodlands and showed no association with measured habitat variables. 5. Reserve selection analyses indicated that coniferous woodlands, and woodlands with a low abundance and richness of parasitoids, none the less can contribute to maximizing parasitoid diversity at the landscape scale. 6. Synthesis and applications . At the individual woodland scale, broadleaved woodlands with high tree species richness appear best for conserving parasitoid abundance and diversity. At a landscape scale however, a variety of woodland habitat types can maximize diversity of all parasitoid taxa. We hypothesize that the degree of association between parasitoid abundance and diversity, and characteristics of the vegetation within habitats will decrease with an increase in the number of trophic links that separate them.

Abstract. 1. Parasitoid wasps are species-rich and likely to be sensitive indicators of environmental change. Malaise traps are widely used for sampling certain taxa of parasitic Hymenoptera, but little is known about how they should best be used to monitor the community at an individual site.2. To investigate the effects of sample duration, trap location and replication on the parasitoid assemblage, we sampled four ichneumonid subfamilies (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) intensively using Malaise traps in two farm woods in the Vale of York, UK.3. Species accumulation curves showed that even with 16 Malaise traps per wood, the community is incompletely sampled. Despite this, we caught up to 28% of all UK species in a single wood, implying that local parasitoid diversity may be very high.4. Abundance and species richness of parasitoids differed significantly between sample periods (fortnights) and between traps, but did not differ overall between core and edge locations.5. Parasitoid community composition differed between core and edge traps, but differences were much stronger in one wood than the other. One subfamily, the Poemeniinae, was found predominantly in edge locations. Catch differences became greater with increasing distance between traps.6. The previous year, two traps in each of the same woods caught only half as many species, but species abundance was positively correlated between years.7. Our results suggest that a small number of traps can contain useful information about the parasitoid community but is likely to seriously underestimate total species richness. To achieve extensive species coverage, sampling should continue over several weeks, with widely separated traps sampling both core and edge locations. Our focal taxa should prove excellent for monitoring the effects of environmental change on biodiversity.

No abstract

1. Knowing how species are distributed across a landscape can considerably aid the management of populations and species richness. Insect parasitoids constitute a large fraction of terrestrial biodiversity and help regulate other insect populations, but their ecology is poorly known at a landscape scale. 2. Using Malaise traps distributed first extensively and then intensively across woodland patches in an agricultural landscape, we tested whether four ichneumonid subfamilies display (i) a positive relationship between abundance and occupancy, (ii) a positive relationship between abundance in the extensive sample and abundance in the intensive sample, and (iii) aggregation across traps. 3. A positive relationship between abundance and occupancy was found across species in both samples, and was relatively strong. Abundance in the extensive samples was positively correlated with abundance in the intensive samples. On average, species were aggregated in both samples, although aggregation was not necessary for a positive abundance–occupancy relationship. 4. These results suggest that ichneumonid species can largely be classified on a continuum from widespread and locally abundant to localised and locally scarce. The former species allow the potential for pervasive natural control of host populations. The latter species, which constitute a substantial majority of the species list, will be vulnerable to extinction through both stochastic forces and widespread adverse forces such as climate change and habitat modification. However, the assessment of species’ status is likely to be facilitated by the positive abundance–occupancy relationship. 5. Species inventories for ichneumonids will be taxing because of the need to sample both intensively and extensively to detect rare species, which constitute the majority of species. However, it is possible to generalise species abundances across spatial scales and years, facilitating monitoring.