2007
DOI: 10.1024/1010-0652.21.3.305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leseverständnis ohne Lesen?

Abstract: Zusammenfassung. Wiederholt wurden Zweifel an der Konstruktvalidität von multiple-choice-Leseverständnistestaufgaben geäußert. Diese bestehen üblicherweise aus den drei Teilen “Text”, “Fragen” und “Antworten”. In drei aufeinander aufbauenden Feldexperimenten (N1 = 371, N2 = 349, N3 = 402) bearbeiteten Schüler der 7. bis 9. Klassenstufe verschiedene Leseverständnistestversionen, in denen sukzessive zentrale Komponenten eliminiert wurden: “Original”, “ohne Text”, “ohne Fragen”, “ohne Text und ohne Fragen”. Mit a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The acquisition of reading and listening comprehension skills has been studied in the context of language competency modeling for formal learning ( Gough et al, 1996 ). A significant aspect of this research has been the debate on whether cognitive processes involved in language comprehension should be considered modality-independent or modality-specific ( Rost and Schilling, 2006 ). The role of modality in language acquisition still remains inadequately explored ( Gilabert et al, 2016 ), and is characterised by inconsistent findings in prior literature ( Zhao et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The acquisition of reading and listening comprehension skills has been studied in the context of language competency modeling for formal learning ( Gough et al, 1996 ). A significant aspect of this research has been the debate on whether cognitive processes involved in language comprehension should be considered modality-independent or modality-specific ( Rost and Schilling, 2006 ). The role of modality in language acquisition still remains inadequately explored ( Gilabert et al, 2016 ), and is characterised by inconsistent findings in prior literature ( Zhao et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, they can be distinguished between according to the linguistic processes involved, that is, whether they involve productive (speaking and writing) or receptive (listening and reading) competencies. Against the background of theories on the acquisition of reading and listening comprehension skills (e.g., Gough et al, 1996), the extent to which the cognitive processes involved should be understood as modality‐independent or modality‐specific has also been discussed for some time (for a review, see Rost & Schilling, 2006). In educational psychology as well as in applied linguistics, numerous studies can be found on the question of the extent to which the four designated competencies should be understood as unidimensional or as multidimensional constructs (e.g., Rost, 1989; Zwick, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In den Ergebnissen von PISA zeigten sich bei den 15jährigen Schülerinnen und Schülern die größten Lesekompetenzunterschiede zwischen jungen Männern und Frauen . Bei De Fraine und Kollegen Lesenden-Interaktion bezeichnet werden Rost & Buch, 2018). Darüber hinaus erfolgt die Auseinandersetzung mit Textinhalten und der Austausch über das Gelesene stets in Interaktion mit der sozialen Umwelt Hurrelmann, 2004;.…”
Section: Die Vorliegende Darstellung Vorhandener Ergebnisse Hinsichtlich Derunclassified
“…Ebenso bedarf es eines nötigen Prozesses, um ein Leseverständnisprodukt zu erhalten. Somit greifen Prozess und Produkt des Lesens stets ineinander (Philipp, 2018;Rost & Buch, 2018). Kohärenz herzustellen und im Text verteilte Informationen aufzufinden .…”
unclassified