2007
DOI: 10.3917/pox.079.0007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Les transformations managériales des activités politiques

Abstract: Plan de l'article
• Des usages du management
— Les enjeux du « label » managérial : des stratégies de légitimation
— « Managérialisation » et « ringardisation » des compétences et pratiques politiques
— Autonomisation et responsabilisation : de « nouvelles » formes d'encadrement et de contrôle
• Comment le management vient aux institutions ?
— Les courtiers du management
— Voies de diffusion, modes de légitimation d'un savoir pour l'action
• Les « effets » du management …
Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The adoption of managerial rhetoric and practices in trade unions occurs in the context of a more general transfer of corporate practices to other social domains such as public services (Walsh, 1995), the voluntary sector (Dart, 2004) or political parties (Hopkin and Paolucci, 1999; Robert, 2007). With their rapid turnover and movement in and out of fashion, management theories are extremely diverse (Abrahamson, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The adoption of managerial rhetoric and practices in trade unions occurs in the context of a more general transfer of corporate practices to other social domains such as public services (Walsh, 1995), the voluntary sector (Dart, 2004) or political parties (Hopkin and Paolucci, 1999; Robert, 2007). With their rapid turnover and movement in and out of fashion, management theories are extremely diverse (Abrahamson, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Côté politique, leur plus grande visibilité de la gestion de l'activité leur offre la possibilité d'intervenir davantage dans les décisions de mise en oeuvre de l'action. On observe une sorte de « managérialisation » du politique (Robert, 2007).…”
Section: Réduire La Distance Cognitive Entre Les Acteurs Publicsunclassified
“…Work on the managerial conversion of public actors, like the political and media viewpoints on the ‘necessary reform of the state’ or the lobbying work done by think tanks and consulting firms specializing in management (Nathan, 1993; Saint-Martin, 2004), are therefore not actually based on any empirical knowledge and do not actually build on it. They contribute above all, in their own way, to the dissemination of the myth of ‘ the ’ managerialization, assumed to be exogenous and homogeneous, by acting as if ‘managerial principles could claim a form of universality that would justify their application to other welfare situations, regardless of their national, institutional and professional contexts’ (Robert, 2007: 8). However, in actual fact, what we are seeing is ‘ a series of ’ heterogeneous managerializations, opportunistic managerial postures produced endogenously by actors whose rationales are rooted in specific configurations .…”
Section: The Utility Of a Myth: Management As A Legitimation Tool For Weakened Actorsmentioning
confidence: 99%