2000
DOI: 10.3406/sosan.2000.1479
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Les honoraires libres en médecine ambulatoire : une lecture par la théorie des conventions

Abstract: Los honorarios libres en medicina ambulatoria : una lectura según la teoría de las convenciones Desde 1980 a 1990 los médicos franceses tuvieron el derecho de elegir libremente su arancel ya que pudieron optar por sobrepasar los honorarios no reembolsables a los pacientes por el Seguro Social y de esta manera elegir el arancel 2 de la medicina libéral (o « arancel de honorarios libres »). El árticulo se propone analizar esta libertad arancelaria con la ayuda de la teoriá de las convenciones. Tratamos de … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Apart from this, patients have no other information on differences in quality of care provided by physicians. In this context, a physician's choice to belong to Sector 2 can be seen as a signal about skill (Spence, ), and patients might prefer to consult a Sector 2 physician in order to have a better chance of attaining high‐quality care (Batifoulier and and Bien, ). Nevertheless, beyond the issue of care quality, other potential differences between Sectors 1 and 2 specialists are observable: if there is a local shortage in Sector 1 specialists, consulting a Sector 1 specialist exposes the patient to search costs, waiting time and transportation costs, whereas Sector 2 specialists can be more readily accessible.…”
Section: French Regulation Of Ambulatory Care and Balance Billingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from this, patients have no other information on differences in quality of care provided by physicians. In this context, a physician's choice to belong to Sector 2 can be seen as a signal about skill (Spence, ), and patients might prefer to consult a Sector 2 physician in order to have a better chance of attaining high‐quality care (Batifoulier and and Bien, ). Nevertheless, beyond the issue of care quality, other potential differences between Sectors 1 and 2 specialists are observable: if there is a local shortage in Sector 1 specialists, consulting a Sector 1 specialist exposes the patient to search costs, waiting time and transportation costs, whereas Sector 2 specialists can be more readily accessible.…”
Section: French Regulation Of Ambulatory Care and Balance Billingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from this fact, patients have no information on possible dierences in quality of care provided by physicians. In this context, physician's choice to belong to Sector 2 can be seen as a signal about his ability (Spence (1973)) and patients might prefer to consult a Sector 2 physician to have a better chance to get high quality of care (see also Batifoulier and Bien (2000)). Nevertheless, besides the issue of care quality, other potential dierences between Sector 1 and 2 specialists are observable: if there is a local shortage in Sector 1 specialists, consulting a sector 1 specialist expose the patient to seeking costs, waiting time and transportation costs, whereas Sector 2 specialists can be more accessible.…”
Section: The Decision To Consult a Sector 2 Specialistmentioning
confidence: 99%