2015
DOI: 10.1111/jai.12928
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Length-weight relationships of three endemic fish species from the upper Yellow River, China

Abstract: Summary Length–weight relationships (LWRs) of three Chinese endemic fish species (Gymnocypris eckloni eckloni Herzenstein, 1891, Platypharodon extremus Herzenstein, 1891 and Triplophysa pseudoscleroptera (Zhu & Wu, 1981)) were analyzed, collecting from the upper Yellow River (Xunhua and Guide Counties, Qinghai Province). Totally 347 specimens monthly collected by gill nets with 40 mm mesh size and traps with 5 m length from August to October 2014, were used to estimate the relationship parameters. The allometr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the Fishbase and scientific literature, no LWRs information was available for Ompok pabo , Acentrogobius cyanomos and A. caninus . The exponent b of LWRs for all populations fluctuated within the limit of 2.5 < b < 3.5 which were in agreement with findings of other researchers (Froese, ; Han et al., ; Ilkyaz, Metin, Soykan, & Kinacigil, ; Islam et al., ; Siddik, Hanif, Chaklader, Nahar, & Mahmud, ). The results obtained from the present study were also compared against Bayesian LWRs data and all are fell within the 95% confidence limits of the Bayesian prediction in FishBase (Froese, Thorson, & Reyes, ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…According to the Fishbase and scientific literature, no LWRs information was available for Ompok pabo , Acentrogobius cyanomos and A. caninus . The exponent b of LWRs for all populations fluctuated within the limit of 2.5 < b < 3.5 which were in agreement with findings of other researchers (Froese, ; Han et al., ; Ilkyaz, Metin, Soykan, & Kinacigil, ; Islam et al., ; Siddik, Hanif, Chaklader, Nahar, & Mahmud, ). The results obtained from the present study were also compared against Bayesian LWRs data and all are fell within the 95% confidence limits of the Bayesian prediction in FishBase (Froese, Thorson, & Reyes, ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%