1985
DOI: 10.1016/0014-4894(85)90071-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leishmania braziliensis: Cell surface differences in promastigotes of pathogenic and nonpathogenic strains

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Leishmania promastigotes and amastigotes are known to have a negative surface charge 25‐29 . Charge‐related interactions between WBCs and filter fibers have been proposed as a possible mechanism for the removal of WBCs by the filter.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leishmania promastigotes and amastigotes are known to have a negative surface charge 25‐29 . Charge‐related interactions between WBCs and filter fibers have been proposed as a possible mechanism for the removal of WBCs by the filter.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Promastigote and amastigote forms of some species of Leishmania also presented negative surface charge detected by cationic particles (Mühlp-fordt 1975, Pimenta and De Souza 1983, Ayesta et al 1985, Saraiva et al 1989.…”
Section: Ultrastructural Detection Of Cell Surface Anionic Sitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cationized ferritin binds to the surface of promastigotes of L. donovani, L. tropica and L. braziliensis (Mühlpfordt 1975, Dwyer 1977, Ayesta et al 1985. In L. braziliensis CF binding was used to identify promastigotes, which belong to pathogenic and non-pathogenic strains.…”
Section: Ultrastructural Detection Of Cell Surface Anionic Sitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The human sera were tested against two representative strains of Leishmania (Barker & Butcher 1983, Lainson 1983: L. mexicana mexicana (7369) and L. braziliensis braziliensis (2903), kindly provided by Dr L. Yarzabal, Instituto Nacional de Dermatologia, Caracas, and obtained originally from Dr R. Shaw, Instituto Evandro Chagas de Belem, Para, Brazil. Further studies of specificity were performed using L. braziliensis guyanensis (7937), strain NR (tentatively classified as L. braziliensis; Ayesta, Arguello & Hernandez 1985); L. mexicanapifanoi (7940), strains AMP (Perez, Labrador & Torrealba 1979) and LR (isolated from diffuse cutanous leishmaniasis and considered as L. mexicana) and strain HM ( L . garnhami or L. mexicana garnhami; Scorza et al 1979, Barker & Butcher 1983, Lainson 1983.…”
Section: Leishmania Strainsmentioning
confidence: 99%