2000
DOI: 10.1080/095006900289859
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning science through contexts: helping pupils make sense of everyday situations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
34
0
23

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(13 reference statements)
0
34
0
23
Order By: Relevance
“…Whereas, connecting science to students' everyday-life experiences has been an important issue in science education and this should be included in science lessons (Ogborn et al, 1996). Several reasons have been given for incorporating everyday-life experiences and focusing on everyday-life applications of science (Driver et al, 1994;Campbell & Lubben, 2000). Firstly, as argued by Campbell & Lubben (2000), everyday-life experiences are a way to make science meaningful to students.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Whereas, connecting science to students' everyday-life experiences has been an important issue in science education and this should be included in science lessons (Ogborn et al, 1996). Several reasons have been given for incorporating everyday-life experiences and focusing on everyday-life applications of science (Driver et al, 1994;Campbell & Lubben, 2000). Firstly, as argued by Campbell & Lubben (2000), everyday-life experiences are a way to make science meaningful to students.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several reasons have been given for incorporating everyday-life experiences and focusing on everyday-life applications of science (Driver et al, 1994;Campbell & Lubben, 2000). Firstly, as argued by Campbell & Lubben (2000), everyday-life experiences are a way to make science meaningful to students. Secondly, there is another argument is that if it is wished to educate students as scientifically literate citizens, everyday-life theme related to science is necessary (Harlen, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Çünkü konular öğrencilerin gerçek hayatlarında yakından tanıdıkları bir olay, nesne, olgu, karakter vb. ile ilişkilendirilerek sunulduğunda, öğrenciler konuların günlük yaşamdaki yerini anlayabilmekte ve öğrencilerde sanki günlük yaşam içinde bir iş yapıyormuş düşüncesi oluşmaktadır (Bulte, Westbroek, De Jong & Pilot, 2006;Campbell, Lubben & Dlamini, 2000;Gilbert, 2006;Karslı & Yiğit, 2015;Karslı & Kara Patan, 2016). Bir başka neden olarak kullanılan materyaller ve çalışma yaprakları da dersleri daha ilgi çekici, motive edici ve zevkli hale getirmiş olabilir (Karslı & Şahin, 2009;Karslı & Çalık, 2012;Karslı & Yiğit, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Literatürde BTÖ yaklaşımı baz alınarak çeşitli kimya konuları üzerinde çalışmalar yürütülmüştür. Bu konular: "periyodik tablo (Bennett ve Lubben, 2006;Demircioğlu, Demircioğlu ve Çalık, 2009), kimyasal termodinamik (Barker ve Millar, 2000;Belt, Leisvik, Hyde ve Overton, 2005), kimyasal bağlar (Barker ve Millar, 2000;King ve Ritchie, 2007), kimyasal reaksiyonlar (Barker ve Millar, 1999), kimyasal kinetik (Belt ve ark., 2005), sitokiyometrik hesaplamalar (Boström, 2008), gaz kanunları (Boström, 2008), su kalitesi (Bulte ve ark., 2006;King ve Ritchie, 2007), asit kirliliği (Campbell ve Lubben, 2000), radyoaktivite (Campbell ve ark., 1994), brom ve yaptığı bileşikler (Hofstein ve Kesner, 2006), elektrokimyasal piller (Belt ve ark., 2005;King, Bellocchi ve Ritchie, 2008;Markic ve Eilks, 2006), maddenin halleri (Demircioğlu, 2008), ilaçlar ve enerji sistemleri (Potter ve Overton, 2006), materyal kimyası (Potter ve Overton, 2006), Titan projesi ve "A dip in the dribble" projesi (Overton ve Bradley, 2010), toksin projesi (Wu, 2003), çevre bilimi (King, Winner ve Ginns, 2011), organik kimya (Bulte ve ark., 2002) ve asitler-bazlar (Ültay, 2012)'dır.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified