“…In this regard, previous instructional ILP studies, with a majority targeting L2 English, have shown that a wide range of pragmatic features are teachable. These pragmatic features include various speech acts (e.g., Codina-Espurz, 2008;Fukuya & Clark, 2001;Martínez-Flor, 2008;Martínez-Flor & Fukuya, 2005;Pearson, 2006;Tateyama, 2009), discourse markers (Ishida, 2007;Kakegawa, 2009), routines (e.g., House, 1996), hedging devices (e.g., Wishnoff, 2000), modal particles (e.g., Belz & Vyatkina, 2005;Vyatkina & Belz, 2006), overall discourse characteristics (e.g., Liddicoat & Crozet, 2001;Lyster, 1994), and pragmatic comprehension skills (e.g., Bouton, 1994;Kubota, 1995). In addition, instructed learners generally outperformed uninstructed counterparts (e.g., Billymer, 1990;Da Silver, 2002;Lyster, 1994;Yoshimi, 2001; for review, see Kasper, 1997Kasper, , 2001Kasper & Roever, 2005;Kasper & Rose, 2002).…”