2005
DOI: 10.1353/cml.2005.0038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learner Corpus Analysis and the Development of L2 Pragmatic Competence in Networked Inter-cultural Language Study: The Case of German Modal Particles

Abstract: This article reports on a corpus-based, developmental pedagogical intervention for the teaching of German modal particles (MPs) in which learners examined their own emerging MP use as well as that of their native-speaking keypals in the context of electronically mediated, projectbased collaboration. Individual learner development was traced microgenetically over a period of nine weeks using Telekorp, a bilingual learner corpus with a built-in control corpus. The current study contributes to the teaching of sec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
22
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
3
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The collaboration had a positive effect on students' writing. A similar result was reported by Belz (2004) regarding the use of da-compounds, and by Belz and Vyatkina (2005) regarding the use of modal particles in German. These two studies tracked the usage of da-compounds and modal particles, respectively, over the duration of an exchange between students of German at an American university and students of English at a German university.…”
Section: Icc and Constructive Alignmentsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The collaboration had a positive effect on students' writing. A similar result was reported by Belz (2004) regarding the use of da-compounds, and by Belz and Vyatkina (2005) regarding the use of modal particles in German. These two studies tracked the usage of da-compounds and modal particles, respectively, over the duration of an exchange between students of German at an American university and students of English at a German university.…”
Section: Icc and Constructive Alignmentsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Indeed, in a recent synthesis of the effect of instruction on pragmatic development, Taguchi (2015b) reported "significant gains in L2 learners' knowledge and use of learned pragmatic forms" (p. 11) in all 31 of the articles she reviewed, although the results were less straightforward in studies with multiple pragmatic foci. Research on instructional intervention has investigated both L2 pragmatic comprehension and production, revealing instruction to be beneficial for a variety of learning targets, including suggestions (Koike & Pearson, 2005;Martínez-Flor & Fukuya, 2005), hedging strategies (Wishnoff, 2000), implicature (Bouton, 1988(Bouton, , 1994Kubota, 1995), modality markers (Belz & Vyatkina, 2005Cunningham & Vyatkina, 2012), and pragmatic fluency (House, 1996).…”
Section: Pragmatic Development and L2 Instructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…
The pairing of telecollaboration and focused instruction can lead to measurable gains in second language learners' pragmatic competence (Belz & Vyatkina, 2005Vyatkina & Belz, 2006). This article examines speech act production in telecollaborative exchange, focusing on the requesting behavior of American learners of German for professional purposes as they interacted with German-speaking professionals in Germany via synchronous Web conferences.
…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, previous instructional ILP studies, with a majority targeting L2 English, have shown that a wide range of pragmatic features are teachable. These pragmatic features include various speech acts (e.g., Codina-Espurz, 2008;Fukuya & Clark, 2001;Martínez-Flor, 2008;Martínez-Flor & Fukuya, 2005;Pearson, 2006;Tateyama, 2009), discourse markers (Ishida, 2007;Kakegawa, 2009), routines (e.g., House, 1996), hedging devices (e.g., Wishnoff, 2000), modal particles (e.g., Belz & Vyatkina, 2005;Vyatkina & Belz, 2006), overall discourse characteristics (e.g., Liddicoat & Crozet, 2001;Lyster, 1994), and pragmatic comprehension skills (e.g., Bouton, 1994;Kubota, 1995). In addition, instructed learners generally outperformed uninstructed counterparts (e.g., Billymer, 1990;Da Silver, 2002;Lyster, 1994;Yoshimi, 2001; for review, see Kasper, 1997Kasper, , 2001Kasper & Roever, 2005;Kasper & Rose, 2002).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%