2011
DOI: 10.1080/17467586.2011.627935
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leadership, terrorism, and the use of violence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After quantification, the frequency with which these words or groups of words were repeated in each category in each one of the interviews was calculated and the assessment of the leaders' traits were determined using the following formula: leader − X − total − X > σ; that is, leaders fell into a category when the difference between their average percentage and the overall average percentage was greater than the standard deviation within the category in question. The criteria proposed by Hermann (2003, p. 32) have proven to be reliable and have been used successfully in various academic works to assess leadership styles (Dyson 2009b;Hermann and Sakiev 2011;Keller and Foster 2016;Rivas and Tarín 2017). To ensure the reliability of the method, a codification manual containing the rules and standards for replicating the results was drawn up (Table 3).…”
Section: Method: Assessing Leadership Styles By Content Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After quantification, the frequency with which these words or groups of words were repeated in each category in each one of the interviews was calculated and the assessment of the leaders' traits were determined using the following formula: leader − X − total − X > σ; that is, leaders fell into a category when the difference between their average percentage and the overall average percentage was greater than the standard deviation within the category in question. The criteria proposed by Hermann (2003, p. 32) have proven to be reliable and have been used successfully in various academic works to assess leadership styles (Dyson 2009b;Hermann and Sakiev 2011;Keller and Foster 2016;Rivas and Tarín 2017). To ensure the reliability of the method, a codification manual containing the rules and standards for replicating the results was drawn up (Table 3).…”
Section: Method: Assessing Leadership Styles By Content Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also worth noting that, as Tetlock et al. () describe in detail, often competing theories or data exist—indeed, some theories might predict that complexity would go up prior to violence due to increased processing demands (e.g., Hermann & Sakiev, )—and this complicates things further. Thus, while these third‐order findings are useful in some sense for showing a measurement is capturing something beyond mere chance, they should not be treated as perfect barometers of the exact nature of the measurement itself.…”
Section: The Gold Standardmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Soviet-era Kremlin was a famously closed leadership group but public statements by its members have been used to analyze its group decision-making processes (Stewart, Hermann, & Hermann, 1989). Terrorist rhetoric has been used to assess the leadership styles of terrorist leaders (M. G. Hermann & Sakiev, 2011) and in cases where multiple individuals within terrorist groups make statements and give interviews, it is possible that group differences and processes may be revealed.…”
Section: Designing Empirical Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%