2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leader behaviors and the work environment for creativity: Perceived leader support

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

37
796
3
44

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,057 publications
(932 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
37
796
3
44
Order By: Relevance
“…They suggested that, because the scale that they used was neutral and focused on leader's behavior instead of the psychological consequences associated with it, it is possible that employees perceived close monitoring as an expression of caring and attention to their work and not as micro-managing. This explanation corroborates with Amabile et al's (2004) findings about the positive and negative aspects of leader monitoring behavior. Recently, in a diary study in an IT firm in the Netherlands, found that leaders' temporal reminders were positively associated with employees' experienced task absorption, which was in turn positively related to creativity.…”
Section: Behavioral Perspectivessupporting
confidence: 91%
“…They suggested that, because the scale that they used was neutral and focused on leader's behavior instead of the psychological consequences associated with it, it is possible that employees perceived close monitoring as an expression of caring and attention to their work and not as micro-managing. This explanation corroborates with Amabile et al's (2004) findings about the positive and negative aspects of leader monitoring behavior. Recently, in a diary study in an IT firm in the Netherlands, found that leaders' temporal reminders were positively associated with employees' experienced task absorption, which was in turn positively related to creativity.…”
Section: Behavioral Perspectivessupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This is the first field experiment that tests some of the core theoretical positions put forward in the positive organizational behavior literature with respect to how positive leaders (as defined by their level of psychological capital) can address workplace challenges to enhance followers' performance. With regard to idea originality, while previous research has found leaders may enhance innovation by being champions for it (Howell & Boies, 2004) and providing support (Amabile, Schatzel, Moneta & Kramer, 2004) and autonomy (Krause, 2004) to followers (see Mumford & Licuanan, 2004 or The Leadership Quarterly special issue on Leadership for Innovation), this is the first true field experiment, which accounts for leadership and idea originality with working engineers and hopefully can contribute to the internal and external validity of these previous findings.…”
Section: Impact On Follower Performancementioning
confidence: 74%
“…Second, our results showed that cognition-based trust in leader mediates the inverted U relationship between project supervisor conceptual skill and project members innovative behavior. Existing research emphasized that the positive effect of a supervisor's competence on innovativeness in an organization [49,50]; however, this research found that cognitive-based trust in a project supervisor plays a role in transferring the positive effect of conceptual skill and the mediating effect of cognition-based trust in a project supervisor is changed from positive to negative with increasing project supervisor conceptual skill. This result implies that high level of conceptual skill may leads project members excessive cognition-based trust in their supervisor which make individual depend on others, then they decrease their effort to solved project-related problems.…”
Section: Research Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 72%