Umayyad Legacies 2010
DOI: 10.1163/ej.9789004184749.i-560.41
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Le califat omeyyade selon Ibn Khaldūn : revanche des impies ou fondation de l’empire ?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the introduction to his great history of North Africa and Asia, the famous Muqaddima, Ibn Khaldūn devotes substantial attention to how the organization of dynasties, their elites and the agrarian-based societies that they dominate, transform over time. 17 A pattern emerges for Ibn Khaldūn first and foremost in the chronological oscillation between simple tributary polities of local chiefs, families, and clans of nomadic origins on the one hand, and complex tax-based and urban-centered agrarian states and empires on the other hand, perpetuated by "clients and followers" (mawālī), by professional, meritocratic groups of administrators and military. 18 For Ibn Khaldūn, society's natural movement towards more specialized, structural, and autonomous relationships of power and authority was a negative development.…”
Section: Some Sources Of Inspiration: Warfare Patronage and Bureaucmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the introduction to his great history of North Africa and Asia, the famous Muqaddima, Ibn Khaldūn devotes substantial attention to how the organization of dynasties, their elites and the agrarian-based societies that they dominate, transform over time. 17 A pattern emerges for Ibn Khaldūn first and foremost in the chronological oscillation between simple tributary polities of local chiefs, families, and clans of nomadic origins on the one hand, and complex tax-based and urban-centered agrarian states and empires on the other hand, perpetuated by "clients and followers" (mawālī), by professional, meritocratic groups of administrators and military. 18 For Ibn Khaldūn, society's natural movement towards more specialized, structural, and autonomous relationships of power and authority was a negative development.…”
Section: Some Sources Of Inspiration: Warfare Patronage and Bureaucmentioning
confidence: 99%