2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0731-7085(02)00025-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LC determination of piroxicam in human plasma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the transdermal delivery avoids the gastrointestinal side effect and first-pass effect, many studies have been carried out in order to develop the percutaneous preparations of NSAIDs, including piroxicam and tenoxicam [1][2][3][4][5][6] number of high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) methods with UV detection [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16], amperometric detection [17] and tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) [16,[18][19][20] were reported for the determination of piroxicam, meloxicam or tenoxicam in biological fluids; however, most of those methods presented insufficient sensitivity (limit of detection; 0.72-50 ng/ml), the use of large biological fluid volumes (0.25-1 ml plasma or urine) or chromatographic interferences. There was no LC-MS/MS method reported for the simultaneous determination of meloxicam, piroxicam and tenoxicam in biological samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the transdermal delivery avoids the gastrointestinal side effect and first-pass effect, many studies have been carried out in order to develop the percutaneous preparations of NSAIDs, including piroxicam and tenoxicam [1][2][3][4][5][6] number of high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) methods with UV detection [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16], amperometric detection [17] and tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) [16,[18][19][20] were reported for the determination of piroxicam, meloxicam or tenoxicam in biological fluids; however, most of those methods presented insufficient sensitivity (limit of detection; 0.72-50 ng/ml), the use of large biological fluid volumes (0.25-1 ml plasma or urine) or chromatographic interferences. There was no LC-MS/MS method reported for the simultaneous determination of meloxicam, piroxicam and tenoxicam in biological samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other workers [e.g. 28,31] reported HPLC methods using UV detection for the determination of PIR in plasma. These studies involved a direct protein precipitation but they used larger plasma volumes (200-500 L) and larger injected volumes (50-100 L).…”
Section: Comparison With Other Methods For the Compounds Of Interestmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GC methods are timeconsuming and have been largely replaced by HPLC methods with ultra-violet (UV) [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] detection, electrochemical detection [36], or mass spectrometry [37]. To our best knowledge, very few studies describe the analysis of NSAIDs via HPLC with fluorescence detection [38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other side effects such as headache, dizziness, skin rashes, palpitations, edema, and tinnitus are less important and infrequent [29]. Several methods have been proposed involving either spectroscopic or chromatographic techniques for the determination of Piroxicam in pharmaceuticals and biological fluids [30][31][32][33]. However, most of those methods presented insufficient sensitivity owing to the use of large biological fluid volumes or chromatographic interferences.…”
Section: Reagentsmentioning
confidence: 99%