1983
DOI: 10.1116/1.572274
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Latest developments in the growth of CdxHg1−xTe and CdTe–HgTe superlattices by molecular beam epitaxy

Abstract: We present here a general survey of our activity since 1981. We show that n- or p-type CdxHg1−xTe with low carrier concentration, high mobility and crystal perfection limited by the substrate itself can be grown by molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) between 180 and 210 °C onto CdTe(111) and (100) orientation. We report for the first time the characteristics of a photovoltaic device processed on a p-type CdxHg1−xTe MBE layer which proves that this material can be grown by MBE with a detection device specification. We… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The growth of compound thin films from component molecular beams has been described by many investigators (Gunther, 1968;Smith and Pickhardt, 1975;Faurie et al, 1983Faurie et al, , 1985Chow and Johnson, 1985;Jansen and Melnyk, 1984;Foxon, 1983;Kawabe and Matsiura, 1984;Myers et al, 1982;Summers et al, 1984) with general agreement that the conversion or utilization of one species and the film composition vary with the substrate temperature and flux of the other components. A simplified description of the generally accepted mechanisms that explain this behavior follows.…”
Section: Thicknessmonitormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The growth of compound thin films from component molecular beams has been described by many investigators (Gunther, 1968;Smith and Pickhardt, 1975;Faurie et al, 1983Faurie et al, , 1985Chow and Johnson, 1985;Jansen and Melnyk, 1984;Foxon, 1983;Kawabe and Matsiura, 1984;Myers et al, 1982;Summers et al, 1984) with general agreement that the conversion or utilization of one species and the film composition vary with the substrate temperature and flux of the other components. A simplified description of the generally accepted mechanisms that explain this behavior follows.…”
Section: Thicknessmonitormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a growth rate of 0.03−0.07 nm/ns and a fixed Hg/Te flux ratio of 1.4, there is an exponential decrease in the Hg sticking coefficient as the substrate temperature increases. While this trend matches that of the experiments, the values are orders of magnitude off, where the experimental Hg sticking coefficients are of the order 10 −2 −10 −3 for substrate temperatures of 400−480 K. 53 Whether this discrepancy is due to the form of the SW potential or the accelerated simulated growth rates being orders of magnitudes faster than the experimental growth rates (∼2−3 μm/h 16 ), or both is not clear. The Cd and Te sticking coefficients are close to unity for all substrate temperatures, consistent with experimental observations.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…The substrate surface temperature (measured by spectroscopic ellipsometry) for an NVESD ECRDetermination of the Ion Angular Distribution for Electron Cyclotron Resonance, Plasma-Etched HgCdTe Trenches 549 etched sample is between 50°C and 80°C. The substrate surface temperature increases as a function of the DC-bias input power, but it is less than 80°C at 180 W. Faurie et al 26 measured the sticking coefficient (incorporated Hg atoms/incident Hg atoms) for thermally evaporated Hg on HgCdTe. Extrapolating their data (measured values ranged from 200°C to 120°C), the sticking coefficients of thermally evaporated Hg atoms are approximately 0.9 and 0.2 at 50°C and 80°C, respectively.…”
Section: Sputter-bombardment Component Of Hgcdte Ecr Etchingmentioning
confidence: 98%