Lateral knowledge: shifting expertise for disaster management in Chile

Abstract

Deemed as technocratic and exclusionary, disaster management has failed in its promise of knowing, let alone controlling, catastrophic events. Consequently, disaster managers are searching outside of science for sense‐making analytics. This paper analyses the emergent narratives articulated by disaster managers in Chile to cope with the uncertain nature of their object of intervention. It explores how knowledge of disasters is modified and enriched by disaster managers in what is termed here as ‘lateral knowledge’: the epistemic adjustment by which practitioners revalidate their expert status by expanding key assumptions about disaster risk reduction. The study, which draws on in‐depth interviews with disaster managers in Chile, suggests that lateral knowledge is established both through the increasing validation of community knowledge and the recognition of politics as a critical mediator in the practice of disaster management. The paper concludes by making the larger point that public understanding of science scholars should pay more attention to the adapting capacities of expertise.

Introducing Stories Into Downward Counterfactual Analysis: Examples From a Potential Mediterranean Disaster

“…Both of these turns highlight known vulnerabilities (Arce et al, 2017;Alam et al, 2020;IOC, 2020), and systemic factors influencing the desire or ability of affected populations to mitigate the impacts of a potential disaster. The divide between known risks and appropriate risk reduction measures is evident in the Eastern Mediterranean, where the tsunami warning system (NEAMTWS; IOC, 2020) only began to be established after the Sumatra 2004 earthquake and tsunami brought tsunamis into the public consciousness globally, though academics had highlighted the risk of Mediterranean tsunamis for a least a decade beforehand (e.g., Tinti, 1993).…”

Disaster Mitigation on Cultural Tourism in Lombok, Indonesia

“…This action has developed an understanding of the process scientifically and systematically, and increased their confidence with important new technical skills and new leadership roles in their communities to reduce the risk of earthquakes (Shrestha, 2019). Furthermore, disaster managers in Chile also utilize community and local knowledge, and validate political knowledge as an important element for efficient disaster management (Tironi & Manríquez, 2019).…”

Assembling Inclusion: Infrastructure, Regime, and Coordination Practices in Chilean Educational Policy

“…This article proposes an analysis of these public policies as an assemblage, using an ethnographic approach. This perspective of understanding public policies as assemblages has been used to analyze several areas of state‐run work (Ariztía, 2017; Entwistle & Slater, 2014; Farías & Bender, 2010; Ossandón, 2014; Pinker & Harvey, 2018; Tironi & Manríquez, 2019; Ureta, 2015), including education (Viczko & Riveros, 2015). Our purpose is not to validate again the use of this conceptual framework to understand public action but rather to account for the complexity, problems, and challenges entailed in the group of Chilean policies being promoted to achieve the inclusion of SEN students or those with disabilities.…”