2018
DOI: 10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20182067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy

Abstract: Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has promptly emerged as a popular alternative to traditional open laparotomy and cholecystectomy. The Objective of the current meta-analysis is to evaluate the effect of Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy.Methods: We conducted this meta-analysis using a comprehensive search of Cochrane database of systematic reviews, PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane central register of controlled trials till 15 March 2018 for studies that evaluated laparoscopic versus open ch… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Laparoscopy has significant advantages over open surgery in managing septic patients. The immune response and the levels cytokines yielded, which are associated with systemic inflammatory response severity, are smaller and influence the clinical outcomes (15) .…”
Section: Acalculouscholecystitismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Laparoscopy has significant advantages over open surgery in managing septic patients. The immune response and the levels cytokines yielded, which are associated with systemic inflammatory response severity, are smaller and influence the clinical outcomes (15) .…”
Section: Acalculouscholecystitismentioning
confidence: 99%