Land Use Changes in the Teles Pires River Basin’s Amazon and Cerrado Biomes, Brazil, 1986–2020

Abstract

The Teles Pires River basin in Brazil’s center-west has recently expanded agricultural economic development at the expense of both the Amazon rainforest and Cerrado savannah. We evaluated these changes occurring in this basin over the last 34 years. Maps were generated to determine changes in land use classifications between 1986, 1991, 1996, 2000, 2005, 2011, 2015, and 2020. The supervised classification of Landsat 5 and 8 images used the maximum likelihood algorithm. Satellite spatial data on land use downloaded from the United States Geological Survey were validated according to 1477 locations, where our research team categorized land use in the field during 2020. The growth in agricultural crops (+643%) and pasture (+250%) from 1986 to 2020 were detrimental to natural areas, such as the rainforest and savannah. The percentage increase in the agricultural areas between the evaluated years peaked around 1996 and stabilized in 2020 at 40% of the Teles Pires River basin’s land area. Land use change patterns were related to political/economic events in Brazil, forest/pasture conversions until 2011, and the change from pasture to crops from 2011 to 2020. There was greater intensity in the changes in the upper Teles Pires River basin toward the south, which expanded northward over time. Sustainable agricultural intensification is needed in such stabilized, frontier areas.

Eucalyptus Carbon Stock Research in an Integrated Livestock-Forestry System in Brazil

“…Such integrated systems involving agroforestry in Brazil's Amazon and Cerrado biomes can also reduce soil and nutrient losses compared to no-till commodity cropping systems [56]. Currently, in the Teles Pires River basin in Mato Grosso, the land area is ~60% native vegetation (forest and savannah) and ~40% agriculture and pasture [57], which is where agroforestry could be more broadly integrated into existing pasture or cropland. Outreach to farmers to increase the sustainability of their agricultural systems by adopting ILF should focus on field days during the winter break between crops [58].…”

Sustainable Development Agricultural Economics and Policy: Intensification versus Diversification

“…Despite the potential for global agriculture to sustainably intensify in the future, such sustainable intensification may not be environmentally sustainable. Environmental impacts of agricultural development include land use change in Brazil's Midwest where native habitat has been converted to commodity crops (e.g., soybeans, maize, cotton) at a rapid rate over the past 25 years [10]. Agricultural row crop expansion and urban development in this region of Brazil has also increased suspended sediment in rivers [11].…”