2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.pss.2019.07.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laboratory impact experiments with decimeter-to meter-scale targets to measure momentum enhancement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our result for 𝛽 is consistent with numerical simulations [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] and laboratory experiments [22][23][24][25][26][27][28] of kinetic impacts, which have consistently indicated that 𝛽 is expected to fall between about 1 and 6. However, non-unique combinations of asteroid mechanical properties (e.g., cohesive 5 strength, porosity, and friction angle) can produce similar values of 𝛽 in impact simulations 18 .…”
supporting
confidence: 89%
“…Our result for 𝛽 is consistent with numerical simulations [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] and laboratory experiments [22][23][24][25][26][27][28] of kinetic impacts, which have consistently indicated that 𝛽 is expected to fall between about 1 and 6. However, non-unique combinations of asteroid mechanical properties (e.g., cohesive 5 strength, porosity, and friction angle) can produce similar values of 𝛽 in impact simulations 18 .…”
supporting
confidence: 89%
“…This scenario differs in three regards: (i) DART's impact speed is much larger than the impact speeds in the laboratory experiments, (ii) the experiment is conducted under Earth's gravity, while the DART impact takes place in a low-gravity environment, and (iii) DART's mass is seven orders of magnitude larger than the projectile in the experiments. Previous studies have shown that the momentum enhancement depends on such scale effects (Holsapple & Housen 2012;Housen & Holsapple 2015;Walker et al 2013;Jutzi & Michel 2014;Walker & Chocron 2015;Durda et al 2019;Schimmerohn et al 2019;Chourey et al 2020). To bridge the gap between the different regimes and study the effect on crater size and momentum enhancement, we conducted additional simulations with iSALE, where we (i) increased the velocity up to 7 km s −1 based on the laboratory setup, but kept the impactor mass the same as in the experiment, and (ii) decreased gravity to 5e-5 m s −2 (Table 3 and Figure 5).…”
Section: From Laboratory Scale To the Dart Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These thermocouples were used to determine when the targets reached equilibrium temperature. In run #1, we hung the targets in the vacuum chamber with two wires to allow measurements of target recoil (Durda et al, 2019). During handling, the targets were positioned on a cooled foam support to limit heating.…”
Section: Target Temperaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In runs #2 and #3, impacts were perpendicular to the sample's surface (90°, or head-on), except for two test cases at 30°(Table 1). The main purpose of the non head-on impacts was to measure impact momentum enhancement (for details see Durda et al, 2019).…”
Section: Projectile Speed Size and Anglementioning
confidence: 99%