International Handbook on the Economics of Migration 2013
DOI: 10.4337/9781782546078.00015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Labor mobility in an enlarged European Union

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On average post-enlargement migrants were well educated compared to the populations in the source but also destination countries (Kahanec and Zimmermann, 2010;Kahanec, 2013b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On average post-enlargement migrants were well educated compared to the populations in the source but also destination countries (Kahanec and Zimmermann, 2010;Kahanec, 2013b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The digital traces, arising from a wide range of electronic recordings of everyday activities provide new avenues to study movements over various scales, from microscopic daily mobility patterns of individuals [1], to mesoscopic patterns accounting for socioeconomic factors [2][3][4], to macroscopic patterns of long-term international migration [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of linearity, the coefficient of our interest will not be affected by other potentially endogenous regressors. 37 Indeed, comparing the third column to the other columns that do not include the shares of foreigners among the regressors, we do not observe worrying jumps of our point estimates. 38 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…A quite reasonable explanation is that a non-negligible part of natives were worrying about the extraordinary spurt of immigrants: The most enthusiastic advocate of placing restrictions on immigration, the Danish People's Party, was widely seen as the "big election winner", as its share of votes and seats in Parliament rose substantially in 26 The expansion on May 1st, 2004, meant that ten new states joined the European Union: Eight were Central or Eastern European countries (Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, the Slovak Republic and Slovenia), and two were Mediterranean countries (Cyprus and Malta). See Kahanec (2010)and Zaiceva and Zimmermann (2008) for detailed evidence on migration from new to old member states. 27 Fears of social dumping and immigration of cheap labor from the new member states lead Denmark, together with a few other member states, to restrict access to the their labor markets until 2009.…”
Section: Descriptive Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%