Abstract:The labella of Bifrenaria spp. and Mormolyca spp. are densely pubescent but those of Xylobium, Teuscheria and Rudolfiella are generally papillose. However, whereas the trichomes of Bifrenaria and Mormolyca are unicellular, those found in the other three genera are multicellular. Hitherto, no unicellular trichomes have been described for Maxillaria, although the labella of a number of species secrete a viscid substance or bear moniliform, pseudopollen-producing hairs. Moniliform hairs and secretory material als… Show more
“…(Pansarin et al ., ), C. dependens (Pansarin et al ., ) and Vanilla edwallii Hoehne (Pansarin, Aguiar & Pansarin, ). Davies & Stpiczyńska (, , , and ) also studied the anatomy of the secretory structures of Brazilian orchids, but with a greater focus on Oncidiinae and Maxillarinae.…”
“…(Pansarin et al ., ), C. dependens (Pansarin et al ., ) and Vanilla edwallii Hoehne (Pansarin, Aguiar & Pansarin, ). Davies & Stpiczyńska (, , , and ) also studied the anatomy of the secretory structures of Brazilian orchids, but with a greater focus on Oncidiinae and Maxillarinae.…”
“…The uniseriate, multicellular, unbranched trichomes with pointed, rounded or clavate tips closely resemble those of other members of Maxillariinae s.l. (Davies & Winters, 1998; Davies et al ., 2003b; Davies & Turner, 2004; Davies & Stpiczyńska, 2006, 2008b). Of the other taxa currently assigned to this subtribe, hairs with unequal Y‐type branching are hitherto known only to occur in Scuticaria , in particular, euglossine‐pollinated S. steelii (Lindl.)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The labellar micromorphology of Maxillariinae s.l. (excluding Lycastinae, but including former Bifrenariinae Dressler, Xylobium and Scuticaria Lindl) has been studied extensively in recent years (Davies & Winters, 1998; Davies, Winters & Turner, 2000; Davies, Turner & Gregg, 2003a, b; Davies & Turner, 2004; Matusiewicz, Stpiczyńska & Davies, 2004; Davies & Stpiczyńska, 2006, 2007, 2008a, b; Davies, 2009). In this article, we extend our studies to Lycastinae and compare the trichome distribution and micromorphology of Lycaste and Sudamerlycaste flowers to further distinguish taxonomic characters.…”
Phylogenetic analysis indicates that Lycastinae should be incorporated into a more broadly defined Maxillariinae. This is supported by several anatomical features, including the presence of sunken, glandular trichomes in both Lycastinae and Maxillariinae s.s. Until recently, these were known only from vegetative organs, but have since been reported from flowers of Maxillaria dichroma. One character currently used to distinguish between Lycaste and Sudamerlycaste is the distribution of floral trichomes. In this article, we test the reliability of this character, describe the floral micromorphology of Lycaste and Sudamerlycaste and investigate whether their flowers bear sunken hairs. Their floral micromorphology is compared with that of other genera currently assigned to Maxillariinae s.l. Flowers of Lycaste and Sudamerlycaste bear conical or obpyriform papillae and unbranched and unequally branched multicellular trichomes. Contrary to previous reports that trichomes are confined to the column in Sudamerlycaste, they also occur in the tepal axils. Labellar trichomes, although often present in Lycaste, are lacking in Sudamerlycaste. In Lycaste sections Lycaste and Aromaticae, floral trichomes tend to be unbranched, whereas section Intermediae has both unbranched and branched hairs. Branched hairs are more common in Sudamerlycaste. Some hairs are tracheoidal, pitted and lignified. These mainly occur in section Lycaste and, to a degree, in section Intermediae, but are absent from section Aromaticae and most species of Sudamerlycaste. Branched column hairs, present in Sudamerlycaste, are absent from all sections of Lycaste, and tracheoidal column hairs occur only in Sudamerlycaste. Sunken floral hairs are absent from both genera. Trichome structure and distribution may prove useful in distinguishing between these taxa and in elucidating the intergeneric relationships of Maxillariinae s.l.
“…Over the last 20 years, a series of studies has investigated the anatomy of floral glands in orchids and their relevance to pollination. Among the glands described to date are: elaiophores and osmophores (Stpiczyńska, Davies & Gregg, ; Aliscioni et al ., ; Davies & Stpiczyńska, ; Pansarin, Castro & Sazima, ), secretory trichomes (Davies & Stpiczyńska, ), spur‐shaped nectaries (Figueiredo & Pais, ; Galetto, Bernardello & Rivera, ; Stpiczyńska, Davies & Gregg, ), nectariferous flower surfaces (Stpiczyńska, Davies & Gregg, ) and other lip structures (Galetto et al ., ; Davies, Stpiczyńska & Gregg, ). Studies describing nectariferous glands in ornithophilous orchids are rare and the diversity of these nectaries indicates that they may have originated from a number of floral structures.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.