2013
DOI: 10.1039/c3an00569k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Label-free, high-throughput, electrical detection of cells in droplets

Abstract: Today, droplet based microfluidics has become a standard platform for high-throughput single cell experimentation and analysis. However, until now no label-free, integrated single cell detection and discrimination method in droplets is available. We present here a microfluidic chip for fast (>100 Hz) and label-free electrical impedance based detection of cells in droplets. The microfluidic glass-PDMS device consists of two main components, the droplet generator and the impedance sensor. The planar electrode pa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
61
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This miniaturization approach has in general made use of inexpensive polymers such as polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) [18] and detection techniques easily integrated with electronics [19], such as optical fibers [20], CCD cameras [21], diode lasers [22,23], PIN photodiodes [24], electrodes [25] and magnetoresistive sensors [26]. Approaches such as label-free electrical impedance-based ones [27,28], while quantitative and high throughput, present high sensitivity to the sample matrix, being affected by components in the sample other than the target, specifically their charges, which greatly hinders these devices' use in off-laboratory locations. This could also occur in fluorescent applications [29], due to non-specific adsorption of fluorophores or self-fluorescence of sample components [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This miniaturization approach has in general made use of inexpensive polymers such as polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) [18] and detection techniques easily integrated with electronics [19], such as optical fibers [20], CCD cameras [21], diode lasers [22,23], PIN photodiodes [24], electrodes [25] and magnetoresistive sensors [26]. Approaches such as label-free electrical impedance-based ones [27,28], while quantitative and high throughput, present high sensitivity to the sample matrix, being affected by components in the sample other than the target, specifically their charges, which greatly hinders these devices' use in off-laboratory locations. This could also occur in fluorescent applications [29], due to non-specific adsorption of fluorophores or self-fluorescence of sample components [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One possibility is to use fluorescently labeled cells for encapsulation and subsequently perform fluorescence-activated droplet sorting. 25,28 Additionally, discrimination between empty and cell-containing droplets can also be achieved One drop at a time A Rakszewska et al by electrical impedance measurements 53,54 or by sorting cells in microfluidic channels based on the Clausius-Mossotti effect, which has been demonstrated for both continuous-phase 55 and droplet microfluidics. 56 Although the active sorting of cells requires a relatively complex setup, the number of recently published studies in this field indicates the feasibility of this approach for single-cell droplet experiments.…”
Section: Active Droplet Sortingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter has been recently achieved using real-time image-based droplet classification [35]. Electrical impedance measurements allow for fast (> 100 Hz), labelfree detection of cells within a droplet with single-cell sensitivity [36]. This approach also allows for discrimination between viable and non-viable cells.…”
Section: Cell Biology and Tissue Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%