Économie Sociale Et Solidaire Et État 2017
DOI: 10.4000/books.igpde.4848
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

L’État partenaire ou la co-construction des politiques publiques au Canada : le cas d’AccèsLogis Québec

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Other authors insist that it was collective action and significant organizing from community groups that was responsible for the program's adoption (Arsenault, 2018;Dufour, Bergeron-Gaudin, & Chicoine, 2020). According to Vaillancourt, Ducharme, Aubry, and Grenier (2017), AccèsLogis is an empirical illustration of policy "co-construction," meaning that civil society actors participated in its development, as well as "co-production" of services, meaning that they also participated in service implementation.…”
Section: Social Housing and The Welfare MIXmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other authors insist that it was collective action and significant organizing from community groups that was responsible for the program's adoption (Arsenault, 2018;Dufour, Bergeron-Gaudin, & Chicoine, 2020). According to Vaillancourt, Ducharme, Aubry, and Grenier (2017), AccèsLogis is an empirical illustration of policy "co-construction," meaning that civil society actors participated in its development, as well as "co-production" of services, meaning that they also participated in service implementation.…”
Section: Social Housing and The Welfare MIXmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the active role played by some groups in developing and implementing these policies, several authors have interpreted the new institutional arrangements as a manifestation of the Quebec model (Vaillancourt et al, 2017;Bouchard et al, 2010)-and therefore of the national question, as indicated above. Arsenault (2018), on the other hand, attributes the adoption of these institutional arrangements to the 1994 arrival of a more interventionist PQ government and to the pressure exerted by community groups, primarily the Front d'action populaire en réaménagement urbain (FRAPRU) and the Association des groupes de ressources techniques du Québec (AGRTQ).…”
Section: The Housing Regimementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Au Québec, la participation des organismes communautaires à l'élaboration et à la mise en oeuvre des politiques sociales au niveau provincial depuis les années 1970 est une réalité empirique connue et bien documentée. Cette dynamique a été observée dans des secteurs variés, incluant entre autres la santé et les services sociaux (Jetté, 2008), l'insertion en emploi (Shields, 2010) et le logement social (Vaillancourt et al, 2017). L'adoption de certaines politiques intersectorielles concernant la reconnaissance de l'action communautaire (White, 2012) ou encore de l'économie sociale (Arsenault, 2018) témoigne également de ce phénomène.…”
unclassified