2015
DOI: 10.5771/0943-7444-2015-7-486
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Knowledge Organization in the Intersection with Information Technologies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the idea of a library classification based on open source methodology could have been successful if a different methodology had been properly followed. Indeed, the social and participative approach to knowledge organization has been identified as one of the key aspects of successful projects (Martínez-Ávila, 2015). Some further considerations for a library classification system following this model are: the rejection of universality as an assumption, accepting that a single system with the same code cannot be valid for everybody in the same way; the adoption of a more pragmatist view for system development, having a clear vision of which communities will use the system and the ways in which it could be useful for them; and, finally, the establishment of appropriate ways to develop based on the research and specific theoretical background of the domains of those communities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the idea of a library classification based on open source methodology could have been successful if a different methodology had been properly followed. Indeed, the social and participative approach to knowledge organization has been identified as one of the key aspects of successful projects (Martínez-Ávila, 2015). Some further considerations for a library classification system following this model are: the rejection of universality as an assumption, accepting that a single system with the same code cannot be valid for everybody in the same way; the adoption of a more pragmatist view for system development, having a clear vision of which communities will use the system and the ways in which it could be useful for them; and, finally, the establishment of appropriate ways to develop based on the research and specific theoretical background of the domains of those communities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scope of KO, as an interdisciplinary field, seems to be in-between the social sciences and humanities, interested in aspects related to veracity and value, and the Semantic Web Community. Several studies within the KO community (e.g., Smiraglia, 2012;Martínez-Ávila et al, 2014;Martínez-Ávila, 2015) have identified LOD as an emerging and key trend for the future of KO. Shiri (2014, p. 19) also claimed that "Big data organization, representation and visualization will be among the emerging areas or research that information organization research will have to address."…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, with the advent of the Internet, IS is one of the sciences that has been constantly re-shaped and in search for solutions for the problems that arise from the overload of information. Similarly, it has been argued that KO has been, or could be, a fundamental process in every moment and transformation of the World Wide Web discourse, and design might be another key area/opportunity for it (Martínez-Ávila, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, Knowledge Organization (1) has been defined as "the domain in which the order of knowledge is both the primary paradigm for scientific investigation and the primary application in the development of systems" (Smiraglia 2012, p. 225). The design of systems, not only their development, has been identified as one of the key challenges and opportunities for Knowledge Organization as a field (Martínez-Ávila et al, 2014;Martínez-Ávila, 2015). As design is part of KO, it is reasonable to think that ID can have many other aspects in common with KO too, or that both are subfields of the same field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%