1995
DOI: 10.1109/21.391288
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Knowledge organization in intelligent tutoring systems for diagnostic problem solving in complex dynamic domains

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Vasandani and Govindaraj developed an intelligent tutoring system that assists in the organization of system knowledge and operational information in order to enhance operator performance (Vasandani & Govindaraj, 1995); Antao et al presented their experiences in relation to the developing intelligent tutorial systems for teaching simulation in engineering education (Antao, Brodersen, Bourne, & Cantwell, 2000). While computer intelligence has inspired the development of intelligent systems, the advent of network technologies in the mean time has helped the further realization of Intelligent Internet service systems.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Vasandani and Govindaraj developed an intelligent tutoring system that assists in the organization of system knowledge and operational information in order to enhance operator performance (Vasandani & Govindaraj, 1995); Antao et al presented their experiences in relation to the developing intelligent tutorial systems for teaching simulation in engineering education (Antao, Brodersen, Bourne, & Cantwell, 2000). While computer intelligence has inspired the development of intelligent systems, the advent of network technologies in the mean time has helped the further realization of Intelligent Internet service systems.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, several researchers have developed similar cognitively oriented FRs with similar names, goals, and foci. FRs that share some aspects or elements of our SBF models include Freeman and Newell's (1971) representations of software systems, Reiger and Grinberg's (1978) representations of physical mechanisms, Rasmussen's (1985) structure-behaviorfunction representations of large-scale industrial systems, Gero's function-behavior-structure models (Gero, 1990;Gero et al, 1992;Gero & Kannengiesser, 2004), Umeda and Tomiyama's function-behavior-state models (Umeda et al, 1990(Umeda et al, , 1996Umeda & Tomiyama, 1997), Govindaraj's qualitative approximations of complex systems (Vasandani & Govindaraj, 1995), and Kitamura and Mizoguchi's functionbehavior representations (Sasajima et al, 1996;Kitamura et al, 2002Kitamura et al, , 2004. However, in this article we focus exclusively on the evolution of our SBF models over nearly 30 years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common used techniques of domain knowledge representation in adaptive tutoring systems are hierarchies and networks of concepts. A hierarchical knowledge representation is usually used in order to specify the order in which the domain concepts of the learning material have to be taught ( Lin and Ruimin 2011 ; Siddara and Manjunath 2007 ; Vasandani and Govindury 1995 ), and can be implemented through trees ( Kumar 2005 ; Geng et al 2011 ). However, hierarchies do not give information about the dependency relations that exist between the domain concepts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%