“…The variety of these problem solving categories reveals the ample space for applicability of the FCM in the area of education. In this vein, the related findings show that: i) insight into the context of educational software adoption in schools could be achieved, which can guide both educational decision-makers and software developers in terms of more appropriate software development efforts (Hossain & Brooks, 2008), ii) support to the online learning community could be provided, by allowing prediction comparisons to be made between numerous tools measured by multiple factors and its relations, so decision makers can be helped to efficiently/effectively select e-learning technologies (Salmeron, 2009), iii) causalities of the education management could be easily understood by linked graph representation (Nownaisin, Chomsuwan, & Hongkrailert, 2012), iv) the success factors of educational organizations could better be understood (Yesil, Ozturk, Dodurka, & Sahin, 2013), v) the assessment of learning on interactive environments could be facilitated (Barón, Crespo, Espada, & Martínez, 2014), vi) learning style could be recognized, by handling the uncertainty and fuzziness of a learning style diagnosis in an efficient way (Georgiou & Botsios, 2008), vii) game-based learning could be promoted (Luo, Wei, & Zhang, 2009), viii) highly participatory scenario frameworks, which involve a blend of qualitative, semi-quantitative, and quantitative methods, could be established, linking stakeholders and modelers in scenario studies (van Vliet, Kok, and Veldkamp, 2010), ix) the domain knowledge could be represented in a more realistic way, allowing the adaptive and/or personalized tutoring system to dynamically deliver the learning material to each individual learner, taking into account his/her learning needs and his/her different learning pace (Chrysafiadi & Virvou, 2013), x) decision-making services could be provided by an intelligent and adaptive web-based educational s stem, provoking learners' traits to adapt lectures to enhance their apprenticeship (Peña-Ayala & Sossa-Azuela, 2014), xi) critical decision-making in medical education could be supported, b exploring extensive "what-if" scenarios in case studies and preparing for dealing with critical adverse events ( eorgopoulos, Chouliara, St lios, ), xii) student's grade evaluation and prediction the forthcoming semesters could achieved (Takács, Rudas, & Lantos, 2014), xiii) stress factors during learning could be identified (Anusha & Ramana, 2015), xiv) making decisions concerning networked learning could be supported from both a static and dynamic perspective (Tsadiras Stamatis,8), xv) a better understanding on students' progress could be offered both to teachers and students via appropriate indicators (Yang, Li, & Lau, 2011), and xvi) modeling and solving decision problems with multiple, con...…”