1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0024-6301(97)00018-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Knowledge management: a strategic agenda

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
138
0
8

Year Published

1998
1998
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(146 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
138
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Some experts defined knowledge management as the application of created knowledge (Quintas et al, 1997), while most experts in knowledge management believe that this is a comprehensive management concept, which is a combination of human dimensions, psychology, sociology and technology. In fact, knowledge management allows organizations to distribute ideas, documents and information.…”
Section: Knowledge Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some experts defined knowledge management as the application of created knowledge (Quintas et al, 1997), while most experts in knowledge management believe that this is a comprehensive management concept, which is a combination of human dimensions, psychology, sociology and technology. In fact, knowledge management allows organizations to distribute ideas, documents and information.…”
Section: Knowledge Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, knowledge management can absorb knowledge from outside and inside of an organization with proper implementation process. Thus, will helps to meet the customer demand (Ouintas et al 1997). …”
Section: Definition Of Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, in the interaction stage, the receiving employee will learn from the giving employee, the former's absorptive capacity and prior experience, the latter's openness, prior experience and expressiveness, as well as the trust between both of them (Cohen & Levinthal, 1990;Wathne, Roos & von Krogh, 1996;Chen, Duan, & Edwards, 2002) could be identified as the important factors for the stage. Furthermore, inter-organisational knowledge transfer strategies for both receiving and giving organisations can be developed to help them to address the "boundary paradox" (Quintas, Lefrere, & Jones, 1997) more effectively and maximise the potential benefits of knowledge sharing for both organisations involved.…”
Section: Future Trendsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When knowledge is transferred within an organisation, the organisation should try to expand the amount of shared knowledge among its employees to an appropriate level (or to the highest level possible) (Lind & Seigerroth, 2000) so as to develop (or preserve) its competitive advantage. When transferring knowledge between organisations, the organisations have to face "the boundary paradox" (Quintas, Lefrere & Jones, 1997), which involves more complicated factors impinging on the transaction. It also requires the negotiation between participating parties, strict governance mechanisms to regulate the transfer content, and higher loyalty by relevant employees.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%