2006
DOI: 10.1097/00006247-200601000-00004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Know staff???s ???intent to stay???

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
29
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
3
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The content of the items in the subscales of the T‐IWPS‐R are conceptually consistent with the definitions provided by Cox et al. (2006) and Lacey et al.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The content of the items in the subscales of the T‐IWPS‐R are conceptually consistent with the definitions provided by Cox et al. (2006) and Lacey et al.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Manager support explained nearly one‐third of the variance of work environment in this study, showing that manager support is an important factor of measuring work environment not only in the United States (Cox 2002) but also in Taiwan. Unit support indicates nurses’ perceptions of their needs being met to access supplies, materials and resources required for their work (Cox et al. 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recognizing that nurses’ workloads are influenced by more than patient ratios, overall nurse workload was measured by the five-item Workload subscale of the Individual Workload Perception Scale (Cox, 2003). Acceptable psychometric properties of the scale and subscales have been established in multiple samples of nurses (Cox et al, 2006). On a 4-point summated rating scale ranging from (1) strongly disagree to (4) strongly agree , nurses were asked to rate the extent to which they agreed that the statement reflected their workload conditions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Cronbach's a coefficient of the IWPS-R is 0.96 and the coefficient of each subscale ranges from 0.61 to 0.83. In 2006, Cox [26] revised the original scale based on its usage and reduced it to 29 items, but retained the same dimensions in the original scale. The content validity of the scale was evaluated by five experts in nursing administration and the psychometric field with a total Cronbach's a coefficient of 0.92, and the coefficient of each subscale ranged from 0.68 to 0.88.…”
Section: Revised Individual Workload Perception Scale (Iwps-r)mentioning
confidence: 99%