2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-61030-6_23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

kNN Sampling for Personalised Human Activity Recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different feature representation approaches for HAR have been proposed, from shallow hand-crafted features to frequency transformation features e.g. Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) and Discrete Cosine Transform (DCT) coefficients, and more recently, deep learning approaches [9,17,18]. All these approaches have had some degree of success and setbacks in performance [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different feature representation approaches for HAR have been proposed, from shallow hand-crafted features to frequency transformation features e.g. Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) and Discrete Cosine Transform (DCT) coefficients, and more recently, deep learning approaches [9,17,18]. All these approaches have had some degree of success and setbacks in performance [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering that the benefits of physical activity are dependent on their correct performance, the control of adherence to activity programs at home is of great interest, which can also be evaluated through accelerometry [181]. This is also the purpose of the "selfBACK" m-Health decision support system, which is introduced in [182,183] for the self-control of lumbar pain. This system controls the activity of the subjects through human activity recognition by using accelerometer sensors to evaluate their adherence to the prescribed physical activity plans.…”
Section: Benefits Of Physical Activity To Painmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If motion patterns between users are different, this follows quite naturally from the assumption behind the classification models that the distribution between training and application must be the same. However, because collecting a sufficient amount of data for each target user is not practical, much research focused on methods to fine-tune general models given only a small amount of labeled target data [12,15,19,32,35,36,38,39]. Acquiring even a small set of labeled data may be costly and impractical.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%