1995
DOI: 10.1016/0043-1354(94)00207-n
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinetic interpretation of nitrogen removal in pilot scale experiments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It can also be noted that the reduction of the HRT from 10 to 7 hours resulted in a slight overall increase in the specific nitrification rates in both systems, and these increases were found also to be statistically significant. The specific nitrification rates in the membrane and conventional mixed liquor were observed to be between 3 and 5 mg‐N/(g VSS·h), falling in the high end of the typical range reported in the technical literature (i.e., Fan et al, 1996 ; Harremoes and Sinkjaer, 1995 ; Muller et al, 1995 ). In any case, the results from the present study seem to suggest that differences in nitrification activity are indeed associated with mixed liquors developed in conventional and membrane‐assisted EBPR processes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…It can also be noted that the reduction of the HRT from 10 to 7 hours resulted in a slight overall increase in the specific nitrification rates in both systems, and these increases were found also to be statistically significant. The specific nitrification rates in the membrane and conventional mixed liquor were observed to be between 3 and 5 mg‐N/(g VSS·h), falling in the high end of the typical range reported in the technical literature (i.e., Fan et al, 1996 ; Harremoes and Sinkjaer, 1995 ; Muller et al, 1995 ). In any case, the results from the present study seem to suggest that differences in nitrification activity are indeed associated with mixed liquors developed in conventional and membrane‐assisted EBPR processes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…They are well above the guide number (0.5 mg/L) recommended par (WHO, 1973). Also, these values considerably exceeded those of the work performed by Harremoës and Sinkjaer (1995). In term of orthophosphate, the concentration registered varies on average from 8.2 to 34.4 mg/L (Table 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The influence of COD/N ratio on the system nitrification capacity can be quantified by means of nitrification rate or nitrifying biomass fraction [26]. Harremoës and Sinkjaer [27] reported an increase in autotrophic biomass fraction from 1.5 to 2% when the influent COD/N ratio decreased from 3.4 to 2.6 g COD g N -1 , while Carrera et al [26] found that a nitrification rate at 25°C was between 0.14 and 0.029 g NH 4 + -N g VSS -1 per day, with influent COD/N ratio of 0.71 and 3.4 g COD g N -1 respectively. pH is also a key operation parameter on the nitrification process.…”
Section: The Interaction Effects Of Srt and T F On The Cod Removalmentioning
confidence: 99%