2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2004.04.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinetic formation and thickening of intergranular amorphous films at grain boundaries in barium titanate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
22
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
22
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[12][13][14][15] These generally include segregation of certain atoms at grain boundaries and unusual chemical distributions associated with intergranular or amorphous phases. [16][17][18] Whereas the design of topological characteristics and crystallography of interfaces is a common approach to GB engineering, 7,8,[19][20][21][22][23] the above effects allude to a generalizable chemical approach of GB segregation engineering. [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33] The overlap between chemical and topological considerations opens a unique avenue for structural design.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[12][13][14][15] These generally include segregation of certain atoms at grain boundaries and unusual chemical distributions associated with intergranular or amorphous phases. [16][17][18] Whereas the design of topological characteristics and crystallography of interfaces is a common approach to GB engineering, 7,8,[19][20][21][22][23] the above effects allude to a generalizable chemical approach of GB segregation engineering. [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33] The overlap between chemical and topological considerations opens a unique avenue for structural design.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have since reported on the effects of these grain boundary structures on the overall physical and mechanical properties in metals and ceramics, such as the being cause for solid state activated sintering and abnormal grain growth. [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37] Recently, Tang et al 38 introduced the term complexion to differentiate grain boundary "phases" from traditional bulk phases. The main reason for this convention is that complexions depend on their abutting grains and cannot exist as separate entities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These grains have undergone very limited grain growth and so it is likely that grain boundary wetting has not taken place. Plus, if a liquid phase had wetted the grain boundaries during sintering, it would be expected to remain at the grain boundaries during cooling, as shown in the work of Choi et al 30 Fig. 7 shows SEM micrographs of the samples.…”
Section: Fig 1 Shows Optical Micrographs Of Series a Samples Thatmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…It is possible that the liquid phase wetted the grain boundaries during sintering and then dewetted during cooling of the samples. Choi et al 30 found similar liquid pockets at triple junctions between matrix grains in TiO 2 -excess BaTiO 3 sintered at 1350 • C. They also found that if grain growth could be suppressed (in their case by pretreatment of the samples in H 2 at 1250 • C), this liquid did not penetrate the grain boundaries even after prolonged sintering at 1350 • C. Moreover, they found that if abnormal grain growth and grain boundary wetting did take place, the liquid phase remained at the grain boundary and did not dewet upon cooling. In the present work, the liquid phase is also found at the triple junctions of matrix grains.…”
Section: Fig 1 Shows Optical Micrographs Of Series a Samples Thatmentioning
confidence: 98%